Mennonites and Mormons. Both need a new Oecumen, this one's worn out.
Dark green environmentalists. Halfway between earthshippers and Ted Kaczynski. Natural allies if done properly.
Inb4 reeee, but, here's the big one:
Hoteps. Talk to Hoteps and Rastafari. Former are genius hyperstition hedge wizards, latter are not fucking kidding when they say they want a Selassie Restoration and a crusade for Abyssinia – they're the black NrX. War makes strange bedfellows.
This is about coopting the idea and inverting it, read the OP you niggers.
I find that materialism is an easy vice to purge, there are (((some))) who are innately greedy but when most men get removed from the mainstream culture they quickly drop it, provided you show them a new meaning to find in life. Certainly you should prioritize men who are less materialistic but in 2019 you may have a hard time finding them, so if you can't just look for men who are on the pipeline (politically incorrect leftists -> libertarians -> civnats -> ethnats) and are competent at some sort of skill or trade.
Women are materialistic by default but they're also malleable if you aren't a pushover. Really the only requirements you need are that she be a virgin and white, if you're older and not unusually charismatic you may need to soften on the first requirement though or simply opt to devote yourself entirely to the cause through some other means by ignoring women maybe nonvirgins aren't that bad I wouldn't know.
Excite hijab supporters against faggots and feminists, Arab slave traders against niggers, black evangelists against afro-feminists, white leftists against brown males of the Caliphate, seculars against religious, etc…
Of course the meat and potatoes of OP's good message get ignored mostly by you ungrateful bunch. We really need to speed up the balkanization of society along racial and ethnic lines. Amplify all tensions and try to increase racial identification. Whites need to see their volk again.
Is this what the honkpillers have been going on about this whole time? I just took them for a bunch of defeatists and didn't really understand the meme. This sounds like the best strategy we've got. We can't vote our way out of this nor can we shoot our way out while our enemies are all focused on us, turning the world into a free-for-all is our best hope.
turning the world into a free-for-all is our best hope.
The beauty of it too, is everyone alive other than White drones who drank the Kool-Aid know that this is what the world is anyway. So it isn't the hardest divide to exacerbate either - just remind these niggers how much they all actually hate each other.
"Intersectionality" is CultMarx realizing that ad hoc tribal grievance is inherently unstable, and trying to duct tape black nationalists and Islamists and feminists and Chicanos into a Katamari Damacy ball of political opportunism.
It's a dumb solution to a dumb problem.
Instead of repeating CultMarx insanity we should reject purity spiralling and accept people that are pretty much three-fourths on board. Dennis Prager is a Zionist and an apologist for the Talmud, but apart from that he's good. Peter Thiel is a homosexual but apart from that he's good. Look at the full spread of the Dark Enlightenment chart and recognize the true diversity.
While to some extent, guarding against purity spiral is necessary, some of your proposals leave us back, ultimately, in the position we find ourselves. To truly satisfy what you describe, I would think pure sepratism would be necessary in the end, with a "I don't tread on you, you don't tread on me" kind of attitude between you and said Zionists, homosexuals, etc, except at a State level. Certainly that would be most preferable to satisfy the empathetic drive, but practically speaking I think it would just be a retreat and put anyone trying to save, or rebirth, the West in a position of weakness once again and simply allow them to be carved up once more in century's or several decades' time.
There is a reason for purity spiral and it is bore out of a desire to shore up points of weakness. Eventually you must declare the product safe, however. But if you consistently allow even small things, well, that's eventually how you get the MIGApedes. I don't think there's really a better, more textbook example. Malice is the wrong approach to take, I agree, but that doesn't mean those things falling outside of the window of acceptibility in such fundemental fashion should be tolerated within confines of said window, so to speak.
[–] 18453343? ago
Do you view family hierachies the same way, where the father's own wife and kids are his enemy? If so, then you're part of the problem, nothing different from a sodomite kike.
[–] 18453363? ago
he does, he does spiritually but he does
[–] 18453364? ago
just as god owns us all. You know king of the universe, His property is the universe. Same to with all hierarchies. The king owns the country, as the chief landlord, the father owns the household