0
0

[–] LobYonder ago 

0
0

[–] Commie_Meta ago 

This does not apply to humans. We are all descended from about 2,000 people who lived 50,000 years ago. That is so few individuals that there was a big chance of extinction just from the numbers.

Each of the human races shares most of their mutations because of this. What differs is just the frequency of the mutations. If you could slice and dice the African DNA and put it back together, you could make a Caucasian. You could turn Eskimos into Arabs with a few centuries of selective breeding.

An example of actual outbreeding depression is the mule, produced by mating a horse with a donkey. Most mules are infertile, an evolutionary dead end.

0
0

[–] 18151349? ago 

Yes, definitely. It's an impossibility to create superiority out of race mixing. At best, as witnessed in animal breeding, you can breed towards a specific trait (like raw power, speed, intelligence etc.), but just like with animals it will always come with massive side effects like a reduced lifetime, an immune system prone to failure, certain diseases etc. So Aryan-Japanese cannot create a better Aryan or a better Japanese, they can also not create something that is exactly on par (because that is logically impossible), what they can do is create something that is slightly inferior to each of them, which also comes with an added extra burden of identity loss. The only way you can breed superiority is by mixing healthy bloodlines from the same race, and these healthy bloodlines can only exist when they are protected by a strong racial community. Blood and race together create a collective out of which individuality is born, which manifests by how the individual uses his skills to help the collective aka living in accordance to the laws of nature, by using your given skills to help the collective, which helps the environment, which helps the ecosystem, which at the end will benefit the individual.

0
0

[–] Commie_Meta ago 

That is incorrect. Cross-breeding between compatible sub-species often improves some traits. This is especially true for species that do not have much genetic variation, like humans and dogs. Most traits are created by many genes, so cross-breeding two groups produces a new group whose characteristics are the average of the ancestral group. Animal breeders do this regularly to improve the breeds.

Cross-breeding will usually strengthen the immune system. It evolves very quickly, so cross-breeding lets you pick up new genes quickly.

Cross-breeding can cause problems when the two sub-species are too different. For example, crossing horses with donkeys produces mules, which are generally infertile. This does not apply to humans. We are a fairly inbred species. We are all descended from only 2,000 ancestors who lived about 50,000 years ago. For the most part, every human race shares the same common pool of mutations. The only difference is the relative proportion of mutations. You could turn Japanese into Australian aborigines at the genetic level with a few centuries of selective breeding.

0
0

[–] 18169765? ago  (edited ago)

This is all straight out of a textbook, and has nothing to do with reality. It's all best case scenario assumptions. When you talk about "often improves some traits" then that is build around centuries of failed experiments, killing billions of lives, which gave us modern cattle, horse or dog breeding. All of these require insane amounts of supervision to create NOT a superior species, but a superior trait, that is accompanied by countless negative side-effects. This process of breeding is always a net negative for the species.

Next you bring up "cross-breeding two groups produces a new group"...and you have to destroy both groups to create another one, that from the get go has identity issues. You just bred infinite mental trauma. That's a massive inferiority, and not the only one because those different groups you're talking about are based on different races, which are naturally bound to different locations. So when you breed them you throw together incompatible climates, which came with incompatible traits, which always create inferior products.

Lastly you talk about "selective breeding"...that never happens in reality. It's based on jewish crimes that forced the human races on top of each other. Be it slavery, labor migration, war, commerce, travel etc. All designed around money, and control. Nothing natural about that at all. The human species is getting systematically destroyed by a corrupted bloodline. Now look at the history of the so called jews. Always crime, always persecution, always on the move, therefore nomadic lifestyle, internationalism, globalism, being rootless. Out of that behavior came inbreeding, race-mixing, psychopathic traits, birth defects (tay-sachs), every degeneracy known to man and so on. Rootless means not connected to nature, which means the collective of blood and race, because only that constellation can create healthy offspring. Go against it and you create corruption of the bloodlines, which is followed by cascading side-effects, which will destroy the species.