[–] TestForScience 1 point 3 points 4 points (+4|-1) ago (edited ago)
He cussed at him while claiming sources weren’t valid without providing any info of his own to the contrary.
Overly-aggressive attitude towards information you don’t have the ability to dispute is what we make fun of constantly on here, “using your feelings as a source of facts.”
Atleast that’s why I downvoated him, then linked my post from a week ago specifically talking about the disgusting inbreeding among Muslims, which, is 51+% on average.
More than half of their babies come from first cousins
[–] Thereunto 2 points 1 point 3 points (+3|-2) ago
Why should scepticism require an explicit ability to dispute? I'm not saying I necessarily disagree with "X" "Y" or "Z" but I am justifying in doubting the face value of info given in a quick flashy articles through politically websites with plausible motive to manipulate opinions.
It is perfectly reasonable to set the height of your own bar for the standard of proof to substantiate conjecture in order to meet your personal satisfaction of the information.
Change my mind.
[–] TestForScience ago
I guess we'd have to ask him whether he was being sceptical or not. Sure seemed to me as though he was calling a specific source a lie, rather than attempting to convey any sort of scepticism to the validity of the claim.
You can't claim the height of a bar that doesn't exist - again, he didn't appear to be looking for any information at all, he just popped in to call his source/him a liar.
You're a big boy, you can make up your own mind.
I also think the claim is BS, but he clearly didn't even attempt to follow the source, else he'd know that the Geller Report's article was from an entirely different source, not something they made up themselves.
Which adds further credence to the notion that he didn't even attempt to dispute the claim, he just didn't like the source, so he went straight to an emotional approach, rather than anything resembling a request for 'proof to substantiate conjecture.'
As I look even deeper into this, he just comes out wrong on even more levels.
[–] Gorillion 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
LOL. Crowder is a faggot you faggot.