[–] Gingercuntfirecrotch 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
A woman who would kill their own baby is not a mother.
FTFY
[–] Slarty_Bartfast ago
I've dug the identity of the student involved in the exchange:
“Okay. Do you believe that a baby who is born alive during an abortion at Planned Parenthood should get care?” Hawkins followed up.
The student replied, "No."
Turns out her mother attempted to abort her (but failed) 22 years ago. I suggest that she follows her conscience and takes her word to heart. Therefore, she is a non-existent being - and not a viable person.
[–] RainDrops 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
Yet, if a single celled organism was discovered in the soil, of say the planet Mars, it would be considered a sign of extraterrestrial life.
There's even been a major motion picture about such a find entitled "LIFE" and NASA itself considers the potential of extraterrestrial life (life that didn't originate on earth) to range from simple prokaryotes (unicelluar organisms) to forms of "intelligent life."
But a human being, a multicellular organism, whether inside or outside of the womb, that is both physically alive and intelligent with further potential as it continues to grow, is deemed NOT "LIFE"....how very irrational and ironic.
[–] chocolatepatriot2 ago (edited ago)
Where is the logic in this pro-choice opinion? how disgusting. As i heard someone say yesterday, Why does where a baby is born determine whether or not it is human life?
if a child is born in a hospital. The doctors have sworn under oath to do everything in his power to save any human being. Apparently this is not a moral principle at planned parenthood
[–] 18006799? ago
the do no harm oath was done away as mandatory a long time ago.