0
4

[–] kayakbassfisher 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

1% is 4x the code she contributed.

0
6

[–] sinclair 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago 

1 fourth of a percent.

0
10

[–] Othmar_Regin 0 points 10 points (+10|-0) ago 

Meanwhile that cuck who wrote 90% of it says we need to give her a break and give her the credit!

0
3

[–] 17988977? 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago  (edited ago)

I checked out his blog. He's a "LGBTQIA+" activist. I guess intelligence alone can't save him from dangerously high soy levels.

[–] [deleted] 0 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago 

[Deleted]

0
0

[–] iLuvJews ago 

Doesn't want his job threatened like Matt Taylor.

The guy who landed a satellite on an asteroid.

0
1

[–] chirogonemd 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Right, all of these guys in the sciences saw what happened to Alessandro Strumia just for saying that men built physics. Which is entirely true. He stated a fact and lost his job.

If these guys want their jobs, they have to play ball, or face the wrath of political correctness.

0
4

[–] 17988994? 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

More likely he's been brainwashed by (((university))) life and eats soy 3 times a day...

0
13

[–] Acerphoon 0 points 13 points (+13|-0) ago  (edited ago)

People will say that "lines of code written" isn't a good measure. - But even then, what did she do?

The algorithm wasn't developed by her, it was from a japanese team. She didn't really write anything good into the code, just the ability to change the color and font size of the bar.
She copied someone else's code.

What did she do? Why is she important?
Some will say: "She was the team leader" - But she wasn't. She was the leader of ONE of the many teams. - This was the leader: https://bhi.fas.harvard.edu/people/avi-loeb

So, again, what did she do? We now know that she:
- Didn't write much of the code.
- The stuff that she wrote, was only for the User Interface
- She copied someone else's code.
- She wasn't the leader of the project.
- The algorithm wasn't her idea.

So, what exactly does she get credit for? For being a member of the team? - I understand that, but then why don't the others?

0
0

[–] TekJax ago 

Well, maybe pushing women into STEM is good?

Do you think women with environmental autism and aspergers are probably more conservative than woke SJWs?

0
0

[–] Acerphoon ago 

Don't know. The girl shilling for the environment in europe and telling people to stop going to school on fridays is called Greta Thunberg and she is autistic, so ...

0
0

[–] o0shad0o ago 

0
0

[–] Itsdone63 ago 

Well there ya go. Every aspect of the bootlicking for that stupid bitch shot down.

0
0

[–] anon44568821830 ago 

Even if she was a team leader that doesn't mean anything. I currently am writing software at a company with only female team leaders and they're basically and extra on top of the only-male architects... These women are there for marketing and image purposes. It's propaganda and everyone knows it.

Post these things somewhere besides voat

4 replies

0
15

[–] DontBeRacist 0 points 15 points (+15|-0) ago 

Obama only 50% black. Blacks get 100% credit.

That's what happens when you're desperate for any kind of accomplishment and libtards are desperate to give you credit for anything.

2
0

[–] TheAntiZealot 2 points 0 points (+2|-2) ago  (edited ago)

He's 0% black. Blacks are American. Niggers are worldwide. American blacks are American niggers. African niggers are African niggers.

Obama is an African nigger. None of his nigger ancestry ever set foot on American soil.

No American black's descendants have ever ascended to the presidency.

If they had, there would be no doubt of their birth certificate or country of origin.