0
1

[–] vastrightwing 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Obviously you aren't that familiar with affirmative action.

0
2

[–] ninjajunkie 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Her vagina.

0
5

[–] SerialChiller 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago  (edited ago)

So, what exactly does she get credit for?

For being a female associated with a high visibility technical project, at a time when the narrative desperately needs 'role models' to deceive impressionable girls who might otherwise not choose to waste their lives on a glamorous programming 'career'.

The actual woman in the story is an accomplished engineer and no doubt very qualified. However, the hype is all about her being a female in a STEM field.

0
2

[–] curiouserdude 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago  (edited ago)

The idea is to promote and reinforce a conflict narrative with the end goal being oligarchical globalism controlled by bankers.

The narrative is Women (or any minority group) are smart and are natural top engineers and would achieve greatness, but the white patriarchy must be swept away in order to achieve this and that means nationalism must surrender to global governance by a diverse set of unaccountable corrupt not very smart puppet teleprompter readers who you will love and respect no matter what they do because they are members of your race/gender/ethnicity/sexual orientation.

0
10

[–] drozzxd 0 points 10 points (+10|-0) ago 

Jewish nepotism in action.

0
2

[–] chirogonemd 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Ding, ding, ding. This is exactly how science can be broken. By having the mediator of pop-science media come between it and the public, to push the political narrative rather than the truth. Just like how the story now is that three black women are what got John Glenn into space. If you control the press, you can write history.