0
0

[–] Bonefish5 ago 

What I don’t get is that these charges “reportedly stem from” Mueller’s special counsel investigation into Russian interference, blah, blah, blah.

But when the report was issued, EVERY media source literally said there are/will be “NO NEW INDICTMENTS.”

I get that this guy is being charged by FARA and not DOJ - but is this not a new indictment stemming from the investigation?

WHY - if Flynn, Papa, Cohen, Stone were all charged (not with conspiracy, btw) OUR guys get charged within the context of the “ridiculous bullshit” of the witch hunt, but the actual guilty side gets to maintain some false image of innocence.

Like - there were no restrains on the breadth of the investigation. Why “no new indictments?” Is this not a new indictment stemming from the investigation?

Why not “investigation leads to indictments on Obama admin side in ‘stunning’ reversal of narrative.” Or “Trump exonerated - investigation leads to further indictments to come from broadened scope” or some such shit.

This just seems so blatantly contradictory and slimy to me.

What is it CNN - no new indictments or indictment stems from Mueller investigation.

I just still am seeing zero accountability from the press.

People I know STILL swallow that Trump ‘colluded,’ there’s ‘blatant evidence,’ Congress is going to expose it, Barr is holding back evidence, Orange Man Bad, blah blah blah.

Just how much is it going to take to flip back to normal from bizarro, upside-down, opposite-world? I can’t take listening to these morons speak anymore! When are we going to get out from under the thumbs of these literal IDIOTS.

0
1

[–] muffalettadiver 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Wake me up when we have sound money.