0
0

[–] 18556046? ago 

"Hitler killed off actual Socialists in NOLKs"

IIRC, Socialist had more to due with desire for "society" vs Lone Wolf. Henry Ford would be "socialist" since his action depended on lots of people working together.

Tesla, not so much.

When did "socialist" start meaning "Jewish faggot"?

0
0

[–] 18556045? ago 

Fuck the gommies.

0
0

[–] 18556043? ago 

Time to confromt the gommies

0
0

[–] 18556042? ago 

Bumping to give the Marxists a run for their money.

0
0

[–] 18416084? ago 

0
0

[–] 18416082? ago 

Hitler struggled against Jewry, not "judeo-bolshevism." Both capitalist and marxist countries were foes.

Diluting the struggle or changing the goalposts is a frequently used shill tactic.

0
0

[–] 18416085? ago 

struggled against Jewry, not "judeo-bolshevism."

Literally the same thing

0
0

[–] 18416080? ago 

BUMPING THIS

0
0

[–] 18261473? ago 

It is right and proper for leftists to contemplate the matter of reducing taxes because a hypothetical 100% tax rate would reduce human diversity to a pure declared-from-above mechanistic enforcement via brainwashing to which society ought not submit. High taxes are requisite under some ideologies, but sufficiently high taxes should be reduced when opportunities arise. The basic rate of taxation is not determined in the long-run by specific modulation of tax rates but is an inferred, ahem I meant emergent consequence of the overall size of government.

To reduce taxes in a sustainable way it is necessary to expand the domains of what people do for themselves. It is necessary therefore to improve the quality of volition available to the public, and this rather than direct exercise of control should be the primary aim of health, wealth, and educational interventions. It is also necessary sometimes to take risks with the reductions of these things in order to give people opportunities to succeed or fail at demonstrating effective volition.

One of the primary arguments in defense of religious tolerance is that whereas fascists merely shatter and enslave people as they shatter and enslave themselves, religions tend to ennoble people, dovetailing therefore with properly considered aims in enhancing the volitional quality available to people. See: voluntary endeavors in religion to increase the quality of health, wealth, and educational attainments among underprivileged groups. Therefore religion is a partner of primary consideration in attaining successful governance of a free-willed and self-directing population, even presuming atheistic governance.

We must not fear edge case outcomes disproportionately, but we should take them on as part of a demicyclic advance. The height of civilization as ends over time amidst the struggle to empower people, holding all factors in balance. I fear however that it may be necessary to address certain derangements stemming from psychology of power in current societies, and I therefore believe that it may be helpful to establish a bicameral system of government whereby one house is selected via sortition and another house is selected via a system of political parties operating on proportional representation. The compromises arising from such a system should provide a spectacularly democratic overview of national status with a substantial potential to perceive and enhance the status of ordinary individuals. To further reinforce the linkage of the government’s performance to that of the public’s, the salaries of all parliamentarians in both houses should be set to three times annual income excluding the top and bottom quintiles. The annual declaration of parliamentarian incomes will surely become a notable day of reflection for the affairs of any nation adopting this scheme.

0
0

[–] 18261475? ago 

the height of civilization advances* over time

How’s that for a marxist confrontation? It’s not too much for the attention spans of you spastic “happy” “heroic” types, I’m sure.

load more comments ▼ (33 remaining)