0
0

[–] 17936329? ago 

Confronting commies is what I do.

0
0

[–] 17936325? ago 

Want to know how I know you're not from around here?

Fuck off and lurk for two years before you so much as think about making another one of your shitty threads.

0
0

[–] 17936324? ago 

The Left: Removal or liquidation of Wealth, Class, and Hierarchy will resolve individual and inter-group conflicts. (Bolshevism)

The Right: Promoting the Individual, Personal Rights, and Free Enterprise will resolve individual and inter-group conflicts. (Capitalism)

The 3rd Position: Acknowledging individual and group differences are biological and inherent, thus promoting separation of groups solving inter-group conflicts.

It seems like everyone but the 3rd position is just trying to tweak the system instead of building a world where all people of all genetics can thrive, but this is just my outside normie perspective here. Am I on the right track here?

0
0

[–] 18416075? ago 

please just try to get the basics

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right-wing_politics

The political term right-wing was first used during the French Revolution, when liberal deputies of the Third Estate generally sat to the left of the president's chair, a custom that began in the Estates General of 1789. The nobility, members of the Second Estate, generally sat to the right. In the successive legislative assemblies, monarchists who supported the Old Regime were commonly referred to as rightists because they sat on the right side. A major figure on the right was Joseph de Maistre, who argued for an authoritarian form of conservatism. Throughout the 19th century, the main line dividing Left and Right in France was between supporters of the republic (often secularists) and supporters of the monarchy (often Catholics).[18] On the right, the Legitimists and Ultra-royalists held counter-revolutionary views, while the Orléanists hoped to create a constitutional monarchy under their preferred branch of the royal family, a brief reality after the 1830 July Revolution. The centre-right Gaullists in post-World War II France advocated considerable social spending on education and infrastructure development as well as extensive economic regulation, but limited the wealth redistribution measures characteristic of social democracy.[citation needed]

In British politics, the terms "right" and "left" came into common use for the first time in the late 1930s in debates over the Spanish Civil War.[27]

The Right has gone through five distinct historical stages: (I) the reactionary right sought a return to aristocracy and established religion; (II) the moderate right distrusted intellectuals and sought limited government; (III) the radical right favored a romantic and aggressive nationalism; (IV) the extreme right proposed anti-immigration policies and implicit racism; and (V) the neo-liberal right sought to combine a market economy and economic deregulation with the traditional right-wing beliefs in patriotism, elitism and law and order

Also look up Tories and Whigs

Original right - monarchists. Original left - libertarians. I am not sure if third position was even used by National socialists. It is nowdays used by National Bolsheviks and similar groups

0
0

[–] 18416076? ago 

National socialists are third position.

0
0

[–] 17936328? ago 

building a world where all people of all genetics can thrive

Read Mein Kampf, the goal isn't to build a world where all people can thrive. The perspective of our world-views is our race and our race alone. All of our thoughts and actions start from this standpoint. Cucked bourgeois nationalism isn't particularistic but makes universalistic claims that "everyone should have a nation", while Hitler made the claim that the only thing that ultimately matters is forwarding the interests of the German people. This doesn't mean "hurr conquer everyone on the planet" of course, but is in line with social Darwinism and a view of history as the struggle for existence.

0
0

[–] 17936327? ago 

Capitalism isn't really hard right, the "3rd" position is further down the right side of the scale if you prefer to see politics that way.

0
0

[–] 17979288? ago 

>>13091888

Capitalism and communism are both progressive materialist ideologies that were revolutionary against traditional tribe based economics. They are both left wing ideologies meant to undermine old social hierarchies. Only in the American context, where we are so far removed from traditional forms of governance, are communism and capitalism seen on opposite sides, because we're already operating outside of the old order in a left wing cultureless materialist atmosphere.

0
0

[–] 17936322? ago 

13090998

How do you remove kebab if you are kebab?

0
0

[–] 17936321? ago 

When you are happy with "Oh, you have a clean signal and…" I don't see it. (On The other hand, if you suspect that it is purchased from the control unit, it will interrupt the functioning of the leg.)

0
0

[–] 17936320? ago 

Fuck off nigger.

0
0

[–] 17936313? ago 

the average person is dumb as shit, giving them any power whatsoever was a mistake

0
0

[–] 17979292? ago 

this

we need a return to theocratic monarchy

0
0

[–] 17979294? ago 

Except that neo-reactionaries are some of the most odious people you could ever meet.

0
0

[–] 17936308? ago 

All marxism is just judaism and communism is the talmud in political secular ideology.

load more comments ▼ (1 remaining)