[–] Pollycracker ago
Brussels bans 5G. If it's not good enough for the New World Order it should not be good enough for the USA.
[–] ShadowWatcher ago
I fly fpv drones, we use 5.8 gigahertz to relay video back to our headsets. I don't know of anyone who has flown over three miles away without use of a ground station, which is a highly boosted antenna for lack of better words. The point is, the range of 5G is not very far, why would they put 5G up in space? You would need another station roughly every 3 miles till the signal got to the ground. Kind of like a ladder of antennas. This is just what I have found from using it, if we could fly further than that away, trust me we would!
[–] WakkoWarner 2 points -2 points 0 points (+0|-2) ago (edited ago)
How do you prove that something is safe?
Take nuts for instance, we ate nuts for pretty much all our history, so it would be reasonable to think they are safe. Yet, in some cases, especially lately, many persons literally risk their life eating them.
So, at most, you can prove something is unsafe, or unsafe in some cases, but you can never really prove something is safe. Life is dangerous, things that are safe for me might be deadly for you. What should we do? Stop any kind of progress because we are scared that it might, somehow, hurt us?
Now, asking that some tests should be conducted before deploying 5G worldwide is reasonable. Asking the impossible, like "prove it's safe" is not.