0
3

[–] iamlegion 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Good thing psyop faggots, ex intel faggots, and every other lame brained faggots don't do real research.

  • A) Cryptological Aspects of ESP; https://www.cia.gov/library/readingroom/document/nsa-rdp96x00790r000100030008-7

  • CIA declassified document of an NSA document—

  • Outlines predecessors to ionization and radiation dosing—

  • Outlines predecessors to war theatre and false flags—

  • Outlines predecessors to using stress as a tool—

  • Outlines predecessors to using pharmacology as a tool—

  • Outlines predecessors to using GeoEngineering to block/excite/track adepts


B) Torture, targeted stalking is equal to or greater than the existence of the Foundlings https://imgur.com/a/u2b1Isw Album appearances AND abductions;

lead us to surmise that we are being harvested, bread, or kidnapped for the explicit intent of making children evolve their latent abilities. ie., -- Druish practices -- Occult Arts (devolving into 'satanism') -- occult and secrete schools appearing and disappearing periodically -- and persian sex cults persisting into pedophilia, homosexuality, and trans-humanism


C) H.R. 2977 https:/ /www.congress.gov/bill/107th-congress/house-bill/2977/text

Section 7 / B This bill is aimed at clearly defining space as a clear zone from these weapons, while stating the bill does NOT exclude their current usages https://imgur.com/a/rrpdqYN Album

(B) Such terms include exotic weapons systems such as-- (i) electronic, psychotronic, or information weapons; (ii) chemtrails; (iii) high altitude ultra low frequency weapons systems; (iv) plasma, electromagnetic, sonic, or ultrasonic weapons; (v) laser weapons systems; (vi) strategic, theater, tactical, or extraterrestrial weapons; and (vii) chemical, biological, environmental, climate, or tectonic weapons.


I submit that A, B, C are part of the same program(s) which have been disguised as a benefit when in-fact, they are seek and destroy, or seek and control mechanisms on all humans on any landmass, bodies of water, or air space.

Weapons in section B are currently deployed and disguised as commercial products under the guidance of the CIA and NSA and used as a conquer and control mechanism against personal agency or group initiative.

NOTE: this would benefit from seasoned PG researchers offering correlations or refuting claims where needed, however, this one document does represent the polestar for many of the technologies and social issues you are all investigating.

———————

Bonus material:

I should note, for reference, as it relates to religious people and their practices/myths:

If you have been brutalized, raped, beaten senseless, molested, tortured or —worse?;

A collection of lamentations from Dumuzid entitled "In the Desert by The Early Grass" describes;

“Damu, the "dead anointed one", being dragged down to the Underworld by Demons, who blindfolded him, tie him up, and forbid him from sleeping.”

Consider the Vatican Church's statue/installation, positioned behind the Pope. This would be the church the ED from OuterDark clearly indicates is a snake head (Horned Viper? Oldest family line?).

The Statue reflects this story, and the process of ritual abuse used to create "adepts" or "gifted" ones. The anointed one is an allusion to what they do their "adepts" once spotted or identified—if they try to be "good"

https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-KSOxOirh0NU/TqnNF-Wgg4I/AAAAAAAACn0/HeMplWHl5RQ/s640/Pope%252C+Cardinals.jpgJPG

Does this look like Christ, or a replication of the story of Damu? I don't think "good" has ever existed and anyone who actually believes in good; are dealt with like this in order to avoid a contagion into their 'ancient' rites and methods. And as a part of the greater alchemical principles of energy, thought-transference, esp, psi—whatever you want to call it, fear will always draw our attentions elsewhere and into a void of our own self-making.

We have it backwards. And that is why we always lose.

I have permission to share OP's original work. https://voat.co/v/technology/3119283

1
3

[–] Toroidal 1 point 3 points (+4|-1) ago 

The Sun does the same thing. That being said, wear your UV protection.

2
-2

[–] qwop 2 points -2 points (+0|-2) ago  (edited ago)

Does sunlight pass through opaque materials?
Can sunlight penetrate deep into opaque substances, and interact with matter inside them?

Now what about microwaves?

Figure out the answer to those questions, and you will understand why the sun does not do the same thing.

1
-1

[–] Toroidal 1 point -1 points (+0|-1) ago 

The sun emits frequencies in the 5G range, yes.

2
3

[–] Tb0n3 2 points 3 points (+5|-2) ago 

No studies show it's NOT safe.

1
-1

[–] qwop 1 point -1 points (+0|-1) ago  (edited ago)

Lack of studies is not a criteria for safety. Studies are done to determine safety limits. If there are no studies, there are no valid safety limits. If there are no valid safety limits, you're flying blind.

The industry is doing no testing to determine 5G safety limits, and the studies they've used for older generation systems are outdated and not done within the 5G frequency spectrum. But it's ok. We'll just trust they know what they're doing.

1
2

[–] BlueDrache 1 point 2 points (+3|-1) ago 

Nor is lack of studies a qualification for it being dangerous.

Show me a reputable study from something other than a fly-by-night bullshit blog conspiritard website and I'll consider it.

Until then, shut up.

2
0

[–] DishingShitLikeA 2 points 0 points (+2|-2) ago 

Next up... Asbestos! The wonder mineral!

1
2

[–] Tb0n3 1 point 2 points (+3|-1) ago 

Gotta be careful around that dihydrogen monoxide. Sure there's no studies showing it's dangerous, but with a name like that you know it's just causing all kinds of cancer.

1
4

[–] Diggernicks 1 point 4 points (+5|-1) ago  (edited ago)

If it IS safe whats the problem?

Where's the studies that show it isn't safe?

1
0

[–] BlueDrache 1 point 0 points (+1|-1) ago 

In the conspiritard head, that is it.

1
2

[–] qwop 1 point 2 points (+3|-1) ago  (edited ago)

Diggernicks I know you like to troll these posts, but I hope you'll never be in charge of setting safety standards for anything. A lack of studies you see, is not proof of safety. This should be basic common sense.

What we have instead are numerous papers showing harm from frequencies in the 3G and 4G ranges. Therefore there is in fact no reason to assume 5G is any safer. Safety has to be tested, that us how safety standards are created. Just putting your head in the sand is not a valid strategy for this.

0
0

[–] GapingAnus ago 

lack of studies you see, is not proof of safety

Nor is a lack of studies proof of danger. Where are the studies that indicate danger for the frequency ranges and relevant power levels. Do note the inverse square law wrt. cell towers and especially sats.

We have known for decades to be a bit careful with anything above the 70cm band but transmission power matters hugely here. So where are the studies for the wattages that will be relevant?