Pan-Europeanism is no different from Multiculturalism
Some of us don't get along with each other and it's completely stupid to put everyone together in the same state just because we're white. Most of the retards pushing this autistic ideology are nazbol scumbags shilling their desire of creating a new Soviet Union
If you guys want a better name I suggest we call ourselves the meme party or the /pol/ party.
I think if we called ourselves the meme party and started having people actually sacrificing themselves for the cause it would grow like wildfire and we'd soon have our nations under /pol/ doctrine very quick.
We should have a codename of warriors symbolizing a gathering of many people from several different nations, but with specifications for sympathetic ideology that you love.
There is a code name that identifies a meeting of warriors and they are:
Templars: an old cross-order
Ustase: a Croatian paramilitary group in World War II.
party: pro-Soviet resistance of informal military groups.
Crusader: holy warrior of the catholic church.
Mujahideen: Islamic fighters very similar to the Crusader.
Pro-whites must have something like that.
I like the term crusader and templar, but they are very abused terms from various conservatives.
I have a suggestion, what do you think of the name "Cruciman" ??? Does not it look cool? "cruci" is a Latin word for "cross".
Three Kings Ultimate Triad.
European Unity of Tri-Rex.
King Science.
King Christian.
King Pagan.
Three sons. One a king. One a noble. One a citizen.
The three kings take turns ruling.
First the Pagan King, whom we need NOW.
Then the Son of the Chosen Atheist King, whom we will need to develop our science and technological prowess.
And then the Son of the Son of the Chosen Christian King, who will deliver Law and Justice to the people.
And then the Son of the Son of the Son of the Pagan King will rule again!
The three kings of European heritage will specialize in their attributes, and due to the fact that their direct descedent will not only be made into a peasant, not for just one generation, but for two, corruption will be impossible.
It will take three generations for the descendant of the current king to rule again, eliminating the lust for power, the grooming of corruption, and the monotomy of a culture that cannot evolve.
The Pagan King returns us to tradition, returns us to our ancestors, returns us to our blood, our land, our customs and cultures.
The Scientific King drives away built up superstition, outdated traditions and customs, and ushers forth an age of science and innovation. Glorious invention and a new world.
And the Christian King balances the other two, by delivering law and justice. The Scientific King will most certainly begin to mutate the fastest, and degeneracy may arise, so the time is ripe for harvest.
Thus the Christian King shall deliver this justice.
But when the Christian King's law and justice goes too far, then it is time for balance. A return to the old ways, thus the Pagan King rules upon the single throne and the people remember the olden times.
And when people grow too nostalgic, then it is time for the King of Science to rule once more.
A double interruption in ruling generations to prevent corruption.
To live as a mere citizen for two generations, before once more being the chosen Blood of Europe.
But who will start?
I will start as the King of Science. But of course, I mandate that the current ruler is the Pagan King. We need to go back to our roots currently, so it's time for the Pagans to rule.
I vote for absolute submission to the Pagan King.
But who is that King? We must find a man of noble blood, a man with a family, a man with a root. A man with a future, and a man with a glorious past.
[–] 18170586? ago
I have been doing this exactly OP. I've pretty much subverted two churches into monarchism while also pointing out the monarch has to actually follow god / be a good king not a tyrant and using the Bible to make the case (very easy to do, as the bible is explicitly pro-monarchy all throughout it).
I sometimes let slip things here and there about the NSDAP and I also refuse to ever talk bad about them, only good things, but I tread carefully. Meanwhile I can espouse monarchism and teach them what are all NSDAP ideas under the guise of monarchism. Eventually I might switch them over to full fascist but even if I don't, as long as they end up on board with all the right ideas, it makes no difference what we call ourselves in the end.
[–] 18170593? ago
Don't the nsdap and monarchy contradict one another?