[–] 17853472? 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
The more I argued with them, the better I came to know their dialectic. First they counted on the stupidity of their adversary, and then, when there was no other way out, they themselves simply played stupid. If all this didn't help, they pretended not to understand, or, if challenged, they changed the subject in a hurry, quoted platitudes which, if you accepted them, they immediately related to entirely different matters, and then, if again attacked, gave ground and pretended not to know exactly what you were talking about. Whenever you tried to attack one of these apostles, your hand closed on a jelly-like slime which divided up and poured through your fingers, but in the next moment collected again. But if you really struck one of these fellows so telling a blow that, observed by the audience, he couldn't help but agree, and if you believed that this had taken you at least one step forward, your amazement was great the next day. The Jew had not the slightest recollection of the day before, he rattled off his same old nonsense as though nothing at all had happened, and, if indignantly challenged, affected amazement; he couldn't remember a thing, except that he had proved the correctness of his assertions the previous day.
Sometimes I stood there thunderstruck. I didn't know what to be more amazed at: the agility of their tongues or their virtuosity at lying. Gradually I began to hate them.
Another technique that they use is to constantly derail the conversation. They can tell that you are about to set up an argument when to attempt to establish underlying principles for the basis of an argument. They will immediately disagree or argue against any principles that you try to establish and then lead you away from the conversation. They like to lead off on tangents, especially tangents about esoteric principles that are difficult to quantify and generally just lead to more arguments. During this time they bring nothing to the table of discussion and try to keep you talking. Eventually you will say something that is arguable not %100 correct and thus any argument that you make is now false. The idea is to make certain that you never make your points and no conversation actually takes place. Anyone listening will only be confused and if they succeed, you will eventually say something that others will disagree with, which will suddenly become the most important part of the conversation. They say very little using this technique and never agree to any core principles, thus they say very little that onlookers can disagree with. Meanwhile, you are forced to defend every idea that ever existed, accept your actual argument, which will never be made.
Another prime feature of jewing is their tendency to the ‘reification’ (‘thingification’) of essentially worthless or vague concepts. It is a behavior you’d expect to see among a tribe of merchants. They manipulate and attach feminized and emotionally-manipulative meaning to ideas, Hate™ being a prime example. Racist™, Nazi™, Sexist™, you get the idea.
This is the tactic that I've noticed the most, and it's one of leftists not just Jews. Because the media is under their control they have the power to make these neologisms, define them to be as anti white and anti male as possible, and harp on it as often as they can 24/7.
It's not just slander or libel any more, it's Fakenews, and only those evil white supremists on YouTube engage in it. Ever see someone take up more space than they deserve on a bus? Well now we made up, Manspreading, a behavior we've decided only comes from white males.
[–] 17853494? 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
The most common tactic kikes use is a blatant inversion of reality.
Jewish privilege becomes "White privilege."
Systemic anti-White racism becomes "White supremacy."
Jewish patriarchy becomes "White patriarchy."
The jewish declaration of war on Germany in 1933 becomes Germany "starting" WW2.
The drunk Indian attacking the White high schoolers a couple months ago becomes a White attack on Indians.
Jews letting other Jews into elite schools and deliberately keeping out higher-IQ Whites is "meritocracy" whereas the earlier, merit-based Anglo system is portrayed by jews as "discriminatory."
Israel, the biggest security risk in the US, becomes America's "greatest ally."
Jews, who have always been parasites on Europeans, portray themselves as indispensable to Europe's history as Europeans as guests in their own homelands.
Whites like Trump are slaves to Jews as Jews accuse them of being "anti-semites."
Jews persecute people while claiming to be persecuted.
Reality-inversion is the most common and devastating jewish tactic because it would never occur to a White person to be that blatantly dishonest. A jew will never admit he is liar, not even when he's caught. He will instead keep on lying, accuse you of being the liar, and try to convince you that you're crazy, evil, or dumb if you don't believe his lies.
[–] 18389201? ago
This
[–] 18389197? ago
Kikes rule rhe media they will claim to have it debunked.
[–] 18389199? ago
Friend, we're the Kikes now.
[–] 18170267? ago
They just ignore some aspects of the truth. That's their main trick
For example
They will ignore and pretend that jewish privilege does not exist, however as white people have more control over their own government and as they have more money because of hard working and oppose shitskins from genociding them, that they will call "white privilege"
Here they will ignore all anti-white incidents and bring out only incidents where shitskins were discriminated
[–] 18427174? ago
whites are causing a lot of the problems
[–] 18094720? ago
And they invent terms like gaslighting - which then denotes something different, outside of the attention in their general direction, but in fact is the same. I sometimes wonder if they do it unconsciously. They can't help themselves it seems.