0
0

[–] 18389206? ago 

To a leftist/NPC, conversation, especially 'debate', has been streamlined to an efficient exchange of social value signals labeled with keywords.

The keywords recall memory of social value signals associated with that keyword, which in turn recalls emotions experienced while receiving those social signals, which are copied by example, which in turn causes the NPC to attempt to enact cathartic (emotion-relieving) behavior, which it again copies by example.

The key idea here is that the NPC has no experience outside the social group - no individuality. It was raised in confinement and never learned anything for itself before it's was completely assimilated by the people around it to the NPC mob.

So the NPCs are trained to have uncontrolled emotion at all times.

They see stimulus, they become emotional, they will feel the urge to recall the keywords associated with those emotions.

Their goal is simply get through the list of keywords necessary for catharsis (return to baseline emotional state), not to make any logical point; they have no concept of true logic, only a succession of emotions that result in either reward or punishment from their masters.

So that explains why braindead leftist NPC just rattles through a bunch of namecalling and self aggrandizing with absolutely no explanation or argument - it simply wants to get through the list of 'good boy' words as fast as it can.

The NPC is attracted to the keyword signalling of its counterpart. It ignores difficult stimulus (not optimized for keyword exchange) that causes it negative emotion and proceeds to the keywords that attracted it.

It's emotions regarding the difficult stimulus are partially released when it completes its signalling routine, which is the reward conditioned into it by its masters by media narrative - "just spread the propaganda and the evil nazis will go away".

Make no mistake, these things are not human, they have absolutely no free will and their instincts have been brainwashed over.

They can't define anything they say, the only meaning behind the keywords for them is the emotional context.

They can't put anything that they say into different words because they can only achieve catharsis through keywords with socially conditioned rewards, so they never had an incentive to be creative and express their individual emotions or thoughts.

They have absolutely no possibility for recovery whatsoever by the time they are adults.

0
0

[–] 17853470? ago 

Hahah, I had that exchange in mind as I read your post. Of course that was the one. Fast talking Jerry Seinfeld look alike.

0
0

[–] 17853498? ago 

How Jews Argue

"Christcucks, christcucks !"

0
0

[–] 18170264? ago 

Of course, the eternal victim kikestian rushes in to make it all about him and his jewish religion.

0
0

[–] 18427171? ago 

Another prime feature of jewing is their tendency to the ‘reification’ (‘thingification’) of essentially worthless or vague concepts. It is a behavior you’d expect to see among a tribe of merchants. They manipulate and attach feminized and emotionally-manipulative meaning to ideas, Hate™ being a prime example. Racist™, Nazi™, Sexist™, you get the idea.

This aint just water, goy. It’s liquid hydration™…

0
0

[–] 18427172? ago 

This is the tactic that I've noticed the most, and it's one of leftists not just Jews. Because the media is under their control they have the power to make these neologisms, define them to be as anti white and anti male as possible, and harp on it as often as they can 24/7.

It's not just slander or libel any more, it's Fakenews, and only those evil white supremists on YouTube engage in it. Ever see someone take up more space than they deserve on a bus? Well now we made up, Manspreading, a behavior we've decided only comes from white males.

0
0

[–] 18427173? ago 

Thought manspreading can apply to anyone

0
0

[–] 18427177? ago 

>>13224329

So you are against the white womens suffrage movement?

0
0

[–] 17854335? ago 

0
0

[–] 18094717? ago 

Was browsing around looking for Baudet videos and I found this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-3wGmGDyE4U

It's a guy who has studied how (((the left))) do discourse and have written a book on how to tackle it. He uses in that video Baudet's appearance in a lion's den (aka. leftist political talk show) to highlight examples from his book. I don't know if the book has any merit, but what he says about their practices seem down to earth and pretty true. I haven't found it yet, but it can probably be found somewhere on the interwebz. If any anon finds it, please link it.

0
0

[–] 18389207? ago 

0
0

[–] 18565198? ago 

That's a good video honestly, it's really easy to wall in a jew.

0
0

[–] 18565200? ago 

You're walled in right now with your comments. You have no idea how flimsy your lead is without the moral support of superior whites. You degenerates are finished unless you obey.

0
0

[–] 18565201? ago 

oy vey

Fuck off to leftypol

0
0

[–] 18094716? ago 

one thing to remember is that they will use the same arguments at various times once they have figured out that a meme has been useful to them. Pic related is one of the ones that I find interesting. This is one of the reasons that people need to be educated when they are dealing with Jews, so that they can identify their nonsense and put it into a larger historical perspective.

load more comments ▼ (17 remaining)