No, that's your mind filling in the gaps. The video does not clearly show a person, you cannot even see the face and they weren't moving beforehand, so there's no way to say that it's a person or a mannequin.
If you have to ask that just shows that you lack the observational skills necessary to have an opinion.
I don't believe you're honestly interested, but I will point it out for the benefit of others.
man with "brains blown against the wall" sits up, moves his arms and opens his fucking eyes at 1:09, camera quickly moves away.
1:17, man in psyop green t-shirt, shot through the heart, looks up at camera, twists his torso and moves his legs.
In previous sweep he appeared (was pretending?) to be dead. Camera quickly moves away.
BONUS CRISIS MORON
man in 1980s European style polyester ski jacket (blue and neon green), is seen sitting up, alert and uninjured at 0:02, and again at 0:09, camera pans back at 0:25 and he's snuggling down getting himself into splayed "I've been shot dead by an evil racist" pose.
There's a reason psyops are normally filmed in letterbox aspect, it makes controlling the frame (and hiding actors fucking shit up) much easier.
If you cannot see that this is a staged event, a room full of actors with no visible injuries ('blood' is not an injury), then you're probably not capable of the objectivity needed to accurately assess the validity of this event.
[–] 17820204? ago
prove it was a mannequin
[–] 17820213? ago
You don't seem to understand how burden of proof operates.
But then, you are a kike.
Kike intelligence is a myth. Pilpul on.