Walking allows normally isolated anons to meet with little risk, make friends, and to organize locally.
literally sounds like an lgbt meetup thing you would see on tumblr or something
If you see another person wearing a white shirt and hat, say hello and drop some hints about /pol/ culture
fucking lol imagine dropping kike bombs, st tarrant memes on random strangers
fucking lol imagine dropping kike bombs, st tarrant memes on random strangers
Meme or not, I think this brings up an important point to unwitting anons who might actually go and attempt to interface with others:
/pol/ is currently being raided by people who are attempting to hijack, misdirect, and pathologize white nationalism into something it is not. These attacks almost universally take the form of infiltration and pushing for an association with non-wn-controlled political narratives ala Tarrant, Brevik, etc.
They want to entrench the far-right and wns into narratives and slogans which they control, which provides the necessary entry-point for manipulation, false flags, etc. Whether you personally sympathize with such far-right celebrities is irrelevant. Their character, narrative, and capacity for inflicting emotional trauma on the public are not under your control. Do not build your political relationships on such a foundation.
Keep your broadcasts in simple irreducible terms. The less moving parts and dependencies the better. And lucky us, simply stating the right for a people's self-advocacy is now considered edgy in Weimerica. We really don't need to be scraping the bottom of the meme barrel for inspiration here. See you lads tomorrow.
after reading your post again I recognize my mistake
although I don't completely agree I'd like to revoke my insult toward your post
I do think the fact you mentioned that is going to attract a bunch of people who are going to derail the thread
All I know is that on a Walk nothing that dramatic or final or flashy should be considered for it. Keep everything legal, unobtrusive, and simple and you'll find some form of success with it.
Agreed completely.
Although you are without doubt a retarded dipshit nigger, please don't derail this thread.
You can shill against Tarrant in a billion other threads on the catalog right now.
Good post. It's enough in this day and age to say that you are skeptical about whether diversity is really a strength or that all this anti-speech stuff is concerning for you to be seen as a maverick. Another bonus is that if you stick to points like that which honest normal people would find agreeable right off the bat, you'll have good talks with people even if they are not anons. Many times I ended up finding anons or friendly people just by talking about basic opinions like that and being able to do so with a touch of eloquence and confidence in those ideas. I think people find it refreshing since those kinds of thoughts occur for them too.
Keep the community clean up on the back burner, don't start a thread just yet, think through it and make it simple and safe.
Certainly, because it is a very different activity. The main deal with it is that such a group absolutely cannot associate itself openly with these image boards or other organizations when it is starting up. It has to grow organically without promoting its image here, otherwise the members of Community Cleanup or whatever they would be called would be likely doxed, harrassed, and harmed right out of the gate before they've had a chance to put roots down. Once their organization(s) have had time to connect with their communities and build up enough rapport so normal people will lash out against the hateful anti-whites who inevitably will come after it, then they can openly associate however they please, preferably towards some greater organization built in a similar fashion or one that could be repurposed towards that end.
Another element is that these cleanup crews would require a basic set of rules to operate them. Mainly internal accountability, opsec for members, standards of behavior, and purpose. These organizations need to be able to reward and punish members independently of social pressures from the outside for instance and not rely on social pressure to do it. Members should only be reprimanded, punished, or expelled if their behaviors contradict the standards and ethics of the organization as defined by that organization's charter. This is important because it will allow the organizations to remove bad apples on its own and become known for it, and also to give reassurance to good members that their organization will not abandon them simply because their enemies make it difficult for them.
Anyway, it's enough to say that it's a much more complicated matter to put together than a simple Walk, but I do think about it and do believe at some point the basic frameworks for how to build local organizations should be discussed so that the fruits of networking efforts like these should be put towards a good use.
Alabama walk has be a great success.
Great to hear! Remember that you and whomever you have met can still go out on Walks and should, and will now have more chances to find anons since when one of you finds another the both of you can know.
All of you arguing against OP for whatever fabricated reason: Why are you trying to keep anons from networking? In order to have an amplified real world influence we need to network, and I honestly can't think of anything with better security and plausible deniability than this. We don't all have the luxury of already having /pol/-tier contacts irl.
The only reason I can think of that anybody would be arguing AGAINST this instead of offering constructive criticisms would be that you're trying to prevent anon networks.
With all the overly paranoid who the fuck do you think you are that you're so important that the FBI would come after you for walking around with a white shirt? Are you fucking Gavrilo Princip or something anons or alternatively, shills, that seem to be invading your thread en-masse, I'd like to commend you for this good idea.
You took care of opsec from the very beginning so that anons wouldn't need to be afraid; of course, the autistic among us will always find something to sperg out about.
Have you had any confirmations of a successful meet-up? If so, you've already done a lot more than more anons have here.
Have you had any confirmations of a successful meet-up?
As much as is possible on an image board while maintaining good opsec. I've seen a number of reports of anons having met each other in Walk threads, which if true is promising. I know that I've run into anons around my area, and I can say that the most reliable way is to speak up about pertinent issues without going full power level on it. The last Saturday that I went out had some excellent conversations. I imagine that there are meetups that occur from lurkers who, despite being pleased about the results, don't say anything about it because they are lurkers. So I am optimistic.
Why are you trying to keep anons from networking?
Those who are legitimately cautious about IRL meetings are concerned about honeypots predominantly and to a lesser extent just believe it may be a waste of time or an embarrassing activity from what I can gather so far. With every legitimate concern the effort can be improved in terms of security and efficacy, so I appreciate that real feedback. The shilling and astroturfing is useful only in showing how agitating this idea is to those who don't like the idea of anons quietly organizing beyond their reach.
What happened to the thread about the "Volunteer Community Clean-Up Crew"?
That's an excellent idea, and one that I was thinking would be the sort of project anons could take on after making their local connections. It really does deserve its own thread since it's certain a few steps beyond the scope of this one.
I wonder why.
This is three-point anon
Keep the community clean up on the back burner, don't start a thread just yet, think through it and make it simple and safe.
[–] 17868064? ago
Alabama walk has be a great success. Beers among brothers networking for the future. Also "muh neckbeard" posters BTFO.