With all the overly paranoid who the fuck do you think you are that you're so important that the FBI would come after you for walking around with a white shirt? Are you fucking Gavrilo Princip or something anons or alternatively, shills, that seem to be invading your thread en-masse, I'd like to commend you for this good idea.
You took care of opsec from the very beginning so that anons wouldn't need to be afraid; of course, the autistic among us will always find something to sperg out about.
Have you had any confirmations of a successful meet-up? If so, you've already done a lot more than more anons have here.
Have you had any confirmations of a successful meet-up?
As much as is possible on an image board while maintaining good opsec. I've seen a number of reports of anons having met each other in Walk threads, which if true is promising. I know that I've run into anons around my area, and I can say that the most reliable way is to speak up about pertinent issues without going full power level on it. The last Saturday that I went out had some excellent conversations. I imagine that there are meetups that occur from lurkers who, despite being pleased about the results, don't say anything about it because they are lurkers. So I am optimistic.
Why are you trying to keep anons from networking?
Those who are legitimately cautious about IRL meetings are concerned about honeypots predominantly and to a lesser extent just believe it may be a waste of time or an embarrassing activity from what I can gather so far. With every legitimate concern the effort can be improved in terms of security and efficacy, so I appreciate that real feedback. The shilling and astroturfing is useful only in showing how agitating this idea is to those who don't like the idea of anons quietly organizing beyond their reach.
What happened to the thread about the "Volunteer Community Clean-Up Crew"?
That's an excellent idea, and one that I was thinking would be the sort of project anons could take on after making their local connections. It really does deserve its own thread since it's certain a few steps beyond the scope of this one.
I wonder why.
This is three-point anon
Keep the community clean up on the back burner, don't start a thread just yet, think through it and make it simple and safe.
All of you arguing against OP for whatever fabricated reason: Why are you trying to keep anons from networking? In order to have an amplified real world influence we need to network, and I honestly can't think of anything with better security and plausible deniability than this. We don't all have the luxury of already having /pol/-tier contacts irl.
The only reason I can think of that anybody would be arguing AGAINST this instead of offering constructive criticisms would be that you're trying to prevent anon networks.
[–] 17832681? ago
Let me be the first.
Seeking another White person for a friendly meetup over coffee. I have no interest in cringe White Nationalism and neither should you. Be quintessentially pro White similar to other groups. That means all Whites welcome including Christians, Gays and Boomers.
I'm near the NJ/PA border along I-78 but can travel in North NJ or far Eastern PA.
whitemeetup@airmail.cc
[–] 17832682? ago
Y tu Dunkaccino?
are these all gay hookup references?
[–] 17832684? ago
English your second language? Or just a butthurt larper or Jew?
[–] 17868066? ago
Still here in NJ/PA.
[–] 17911767? ago
Still here in the NJ/PA area.
[–] 18083032? ago
Still interested in the NJ/PA area.
[–] 18083033? ago
Don't say, just do.