0
0

[–] 18007787? ago 

You give your face (and thus all personal information, as well as associates) to the feds.

Do you think feds of omniscient? Or that everyone around you is a federal agent? Or that the feds care so much about you in particular that they will sift through literally terabytes of potential data just to find you and then deploy agents into the Case of the Anon to knock on your door for illegal walking and talking? Best you and your face just sit in your basement then. It must be the most dangerous face in the world if the merest glance at it will alert the entire shadow government.

>>13104993

There's a reason why I leave it open to anons as to what to do with their newfound contacts. Do they want to befriend them? Invite them to whatever? Treat it as just a pleasant encounter for a day? It's up to the anon and the meeting. I wouldn't advocate inviting total strangers into an organization until you've had a chance to get to know them. It's another topic, but all organizations worth their while will get infiltrated by spies and subversives. It is a matter of making an organization that will be able to resist their influence and still be effective more than it is in rooting them out. But an ounce of prevention is always good to take when it comes to it. Definitely start with your existing friends and expand your network from there, and Walks don't prevent you from doing both at once.

0
0

[–] 18007793? ago 

Or that the feds care so much about you in particular that they will sift through literally terabytes of potential data

They have software that redflags the .00001 % based on keywords/keyphrases. Then an agent reads it to determine the context.

You are very disingenous. Just like how DRONES COST SO MUCH HURRRRR.

0
0

[–] 18007811? ago 

Here's your homework then: Determine how many potential locations might fall under "park nearest city hall". Then find the specific drone costs to cover each potential area, and how many agents it will take to sift through the hundreds of hours of footage that would be collected over the three and a half hour timeframe of suggested meetups. Multiply those numbers by their average wages and costs of deploying the drones, and then tell the thread the retarded-high number you come up with. And don't forget to include how many of the potential hits of a guy with a white shirt being in one of those locations would turn out to be either a non-anon or a completely law-abiding anon, and how many investigation hours it would take to confirm or deny their interest to the authorities on top of your previous costs. I'm sure after all your specific calculations you'll overawe the anons in the thread and convince everyone not to do what OP says.

0
0

[–] 18007788? ago 

Well said. But the default answer is "Just Walk, Don't Fedpost"