0
0

[–] 17840385? ago 

>>13073920

>>13068101

It's an interesting angle of attack. So previous Walk threads were basically attacked only with "muh honeypot" posts, which could at least point to the specifics about the specific city-location list and say, with some validity, that there was an opsec issue there. I supposed that with this new formulation those attacks would diminish, and for a time they did. "Muh honeypot" posts kept coming in, but obviously came from those who wouldn't, or couldn't, read the OP and understand it. Then the concerning trolling died down, as if regrouping and assessing, and then came the two new prongs of the attacks: Paranoia leveraging and negative association.

The paranoia stuff about drones, stalking, FBI infiltrators, and all that is meant only to frighten people enough to stop them from thinking any further. The negative association with some degeneracy (the posts claiming this is literally homosexual behavior) is meant to evoke disgust and revulsion in potential anons. I'm surprised the jew angle hasn't come up yet, but if these two strategies don't seem to work that will be among the next batch of attack angles used I wager.

My goal is very simple: Create a method that might benefit networking among the better elements of /pol/'s userbase without compromising their security in the process. There are only two kinds of camps against this idea: Those who believe it is a trap laid out for anons, and those that do not want anons to meet up. The former tend to engage in the topic with actual critiques of the process, while the latter spiral off into unrelated hysterics and attack vectors if and when their opening gambits fail. For anyone who has been on /pol/ for awhile, this is not unique to these threads.

Others have said it, but I think that the shilling and concern trolling on these threads has increased tremendously due to the fact that this Walk does not have an obvious weakness aside from logistics, which in the end is also its greatest protective feature. It is an idea that is extremely difficult to assail once people start doing it, and the only place to stop that activity would be at the bottleneck right here, on this board and in this thread. If an anon is convinced of this and practices good opsec as is constantly encouraged by the honest actors, there is no stopping them from that point forward. And that must be frightening to those who are compensated to stop the growth of redpilled networks.

0
0

[–] 17868044? ago 

police departments already have drones

a 5 year old can pilot a drone

some IT dork who is already on the payroll gets an extra duty that's actually fun for once piloting said drone

Dude just stfu. Your wordy responses are nothing but fluff, as proven by the delusion / excuse you use to dismiss how easy it would be to spy on people with drones.

0
0

[–] 17840386? ago 

…Or maybe, just maybe, the posters bullying OP and the rest aren't actually FBI or Jews or antifa, they're just anon doing what anon always does: mock you for being a faggot. That would actually make sense since meeting random dudes off the internet for no specific reason is at best immature, socially-inept and likely indicative of a person who has had very few male role models (cringe) or at worst a red flag indicating unstable/dangerous/delusional tendencies and agendas or a straight-up trap from outsiders looking for a literal nazi to entrap/punch. Which are you?

Again, grown men generally don't do this shit that you're trying to meme and they sure as shit don't do it with randos from weird asian basket weaving forums from the Internet. "Social mixing" meetups are effeminate and strange. Men size each other up and bond over specific projects and goals (even if the goal is getting shit-faced drunk) with the upshot being that through those concrete activities, they sort the social shit out without trying. By proving ourselves through action, we build reputation and trust.

I understand if this is a bitter pill to swallow. You may be very young or troubled or literally autistic or deeply lacking in strong male role models (or all of the above). You're certainly awash in endless examples of what not to do so the confusion is understandable, but that doens't make it any less gay / creepy / suspicious.

This may blow your mind, but you're on an anonymous image board for a reason and if you're above the age of 25, then you should probably be building things outside of fucking /pol/ unless you have some specific nazi madman agenda. If social networking is your nazi madman agenda i would reiterate that you're on an anonymous image board for a reason. You're literally doing it wrong. That doesn't mean you should stop lurking and shitposting, but don't try to turn this place into your own personal dating site because you're no longer a kid and you find it hard "meeting cool people". I have bad news: after 22-23, it gets increasingly harder to meet people in general until you're old as fuck. Accept it. Find a purpose and IRL dragons to slay. Love it. Let them kill you. In the process you will meet people, some good, a lot shitty. But if you're lucky and not a total dick, you may collect enough decent associates/allies/friends to serve as pallbearers for when the dragon kills you.

0
0

[–] 17840400? ago 

they're just anon doing what anon always does

Extremely unlikely, for the following reason: The past Walk threads had nothing like this in terms of shilling and concern trolling. This is oddly specific, focused, obsessive, and repetitive for the insults of typical anons. When normal discussion occurs it is evident, and when it isn't occurring it is even more apparent. I don't think your post is necessarily part of that, but I do disagree with your sentiments and approach to this.

That would actually make sense since meeting random dudes off the internet for no specific reason

There is an extremely specific reason for it: networking. Meet and greets, cocktail parties, golfing trips, all that shit is for the exact same reason. The venue and method of meeting is different, that is all. To claim that networking is therefore faggy or a trap because you can't comprehend the value of networking with likeminded people is not based in real knowledge of what this effort is.

Which are you?

False dichotomy. Your setup is flawed.

"Social mixing" meetups are effeminate and strange.

This isn't a tea party for little girlies, anon. I don't see it that way at all. I see it like any meet and greet in business, leading to those very activities of shared goals and entertainment you and I both value and far more important associations.

But tell me how you're going to get shitfaced drunk or into training groups or gun clubs with anons who are already on your level if you haven't met them already? There's three options: Either you join your clubs and hope you can find some other anons doing the same, you speak publicly in such a fashion as to attract the redpilled types towards yourself, or you can try to create a place for meeting anons that doesn't depend on specific interests or passtimes or occupations. I don't dismiss any of those methods, but I do point out the strengths and weaknesses of each and promote this particular idea because it has a particular value to it in terms of network spread.

You may be very young or troubled or literally autistic or deeply lacking in strong male role models (or all of the above).

That's your problem, really. You have created a caricature in your mind of the person who proposed an idea that you cannot appreciate or maybe even understand. Because you "feel" negatively about the idea, you have to rationalize that the speaker must be flawed in order for you to more easily dismiss it and dissuade others from thinking about it because that would earn your social disapproval. For someone complaining about effeminate behaviors and touts how manly-men do socializing, your entire approach to this matter is rather girlish and passive-aggressive aside from being over-assuming. Don't do that.

after 22-23, it gets increasingly harder to meet people in general until you're old as fuck.

Ever stopped to wonder why that is occurring? I meet more people now than I ever met in the past. Why is that? Because I now engage in more venues that allow me to meet new people. I network, particularly in methods and forums that bring in a wide cast of characters. You don't, presumably, because you don't value activities that would allow you to connect with people outside of your narrow band of personal interests. That's why you'd say a person grows old meeting fewer people because you exhaust your own meeting grounds. A Walk is just one method of finding potential inroads to totally different social circles that nonetheless have something very deeply in common with you that most anyone could do. None of that requires you to stop doing whatever it is you do right now, but it does require you to open your mind a bit and stop denigrating ideas you aren't familiar with.

But if you're lucky and not a total dick, you may collect enough decent associates/allies/friends to serve as pallbearers for when the dragon kills you.

Sounds unnecessarily fatalist. I've a much more positive notion of glory and comradeship that inspires me to keep up the dragon-fighting. I've made great friends and great enemies for it too, and I would only want to continue it. Cheer up a bit.

0
0

[–] 17840388? ago 

Sorry if your post is heartfelt, but frankly, with all of the recent flooding on this board, I find it far more likely that most of the dissuasive posters including yourself are just intentionally deploying yourselves here to prevent people from networking. I understand every thread is going to have its namecalling and vitriol. But to /pol/-frequents there is very clearly an abnormally high concentration of attacks in threads like this, oriented specifically against attempts at networking. I'm enough of a loser to have been lurking on /pol/ long enough to know that passer-by trolling usually does not look like this.

Obviously nothing I can prove; it's an anonymous board. But this brand of total assuredness, in implying that this behaviour is run of the mill organic posting, no chance of D&C whatsoever, really is quite disingenuous and frankly underestimating your average reader's sense for shilling, hijacking, etc.

So say whatever you want about everyone quarantining themselves here due to their own social ineptitude. If it truly is so ridiculous that a bunch of socially-inept rejects organized some big gay meetup, I have a very hard time believing there would be such a contrived effort put forth to bully and rip them down. If it really is all so stupid and childish, then you playing the concerned father preaching bitter wisdom, would know to teach your kids to not be afraid of scraping their skin up. What are you really teaching, to be dissuaded against doing what you want to do by some soccer mom wisdom about making friends and slaying dragons? THAT's fucking gay. Let them try and fail if you're so sure.

0
0

[–] 17840384? ago 

We're not afraid of you.