0
0

[–] 17840383? ago 

>>13074067

no more larping, let's get serious!

whites shouldnt be afraid to meet other whites

b-but… why do we need to meet?

you know.. just to talk.. about guy things or whatever… get to know each other better, as men…

b-but… men dont just meet other dudes to "talk". That sounds faggy as fuck

so, you're a shitposting jewish nazi larper who is also a homophobe. Nice.

t. trust us, we're white

these meetup honeypot threads never get old. Please don't ever stop making them.

0
0

[–] 17840384? ago 

We're not afraid of you.

0
0

[–] 17840385? ago 

>>13073920

>>13068101

It's an interesting angle of attack. So previous Walk threads were basically attacked only with "muh honeypot" posts, which could at least point to the specifics about the specific city-location list and say, with some validity, that there was an opsec issue there. I supposed that with this new formulation those attacks would diminish, and for a time they did. "Muh honeypot" posts kept coming in, but obviously came from those who wouldn't, or couldn't, read the OP and understand it. Then the concerning trolling died down, as if regrouping and assessing, and then came the two new prongs of the attacks: Paranoia leveraging and negative association.

The paranoia stuff about drones, stalking, FBI infiltrators, and all that is meant only to frighten people enough to stop them from thinking any further. The negative association with some degeneracy (the posts claiming this is literally homosexual behavior) is meant to evoke disgust and revulsion in potential anons. I'm surprised the jew angle hasn't come up yet, but if these two strategies don't seem to work that will be among the next batch of attack angles used I wager.

My goal is very simple: Create a method that might benefit networking among the better elements of /pol/'s userbase without compromising their security in the process. There are only two kinds of camps against this idea: Those who believe it is a trap laid out for anons, and those that do not want anons to meet up. The former tend to engage in the topic with actual critiques of the process, while the latter spiral off into unrelated hysterics and attack vectors if and when their opening gambits fail. For anyone who has been on /pol/ for awhile, this is not unique to these threads.

Others have said it, but I think that the shilling and concern trolling on these threads has increased tremendously due to the fact that this Walk does not have an obvious weakness aside from logistics, which in the end is also its greatest protective feature. It is an idea that is extremely difficult to assail once people start doing it, and the only place to stop that activity would be at the bottleneck right here, on this board and in this thread. If an anon is convinced of this and practices good opsec as is constantly encouraged by the honest actors, there is no stopping them from that point forward. And that must be frightening to those who are compensated to stop the growth of redpilled networks.

0
0

[–] 17840386? ago 

…Or maybe, just maybe, the posters bullying OP and the rest aren't actually FBI or Jews or antifa, they're just anon doing what anon always does: mock you for being a faggot. That would actually make sense since meeting random dudes off the internet for no specific reason is at best immature, socially-inept and likely indicative of a person who has had very few male role models (cringe) or at worst a red flag indicating unstable/dangerous/delusional tendencies and agendas or a straight-up trap from outsiders looking for a literal nazi to entrap/punch. Which are you?

Again, grown men generally don't do this shit that you're trying to meme and they sure as shit don't do it with randos from weird asian basket weaving forums from the Internet. "Social mixing" meetups are effeminate and strange. Men size each other up and bond over specific projects and goals (even if the goal is getting shit-faced drunk) with the upshot being that through those concrete activities, they sort the social shit out without trying. By proving ourselves through action, we build reputation and trust.

I understand if this is a bitter pill to swallow. You may be very young or troubled or literally autistic or deeply lacking in strong male role models (or all of the above). You're certainly awash in endless examples of what not to do so the confusion is understandable, but that doens't make it any less gay / creepy / suspicious.

This may blow your mind, but you're on an anonymous image board for a reason and if you're above the age of 25, then you should probably be building things outside of fucking /pol/ unless you have some specific nazi madman agenda. If social networking is your nazi madman agenda i would reiterate that you're on an anonymous image board for a reason. You're literally doing it wrong. That doesn't mean you should stop lurking and shitposting, but don't try to turn this place into your own personal dating site because you're no longer a kid and you find it hard "meeting cool people". I have bad news: after 22-23, it gets increasingly harder to meet people in general until you're old as fuck. Accept it. Find a purpose and IRL dragons to slay. Love it. Let them kill you. In the process you will meet people, some good, a lot shitty. But if you're lucky and not a total dick, you may collect enough decent associates/allies/friends to serve as pallbearers for when the dragon kills you.

0
0

[–] 17868044? ago 

police departments already have drones

a 5 year old can pilot a drone

some IT dork who is already on the payroll gets an extra duty that's actually fun for once piloting said drone

Dude just stfu. Your wordy responses are nothing but fluff, as proven by the delusion / excuse you use to dismiss how easy it would be to spy on people with drones.