About the only genuine point brought up was preplanned places and times. But the only exact place is a city hall, which I'd say just about every anon is going to avoid. Parks are plentiful and vague enough.
<they dont have the money (as if sending a drone cost that much)
Drones do cost a lot
<anyone who is against my useless idea MUST be a shill
There's concerned anons sure, but the amount of one and done replies that consist of five word sentences or less tends to make people think they aren't genuine.
<the feds wouldnt waste their time on this
Cost vs actual benefit seems like they wouldn't, but again this isn't for planning to bomb buildings. This is just networking. Anons are hopefully smart enough to not fall for any fed-like suggestions.
[–] 17802442? ago
You are listing the specific park. You are wearing a white shirt. I'm pretty sure that narrows it done enough to figure out who's from here.
Everyone. Everyone look at this guy and laugh.
also
FUCKING IMPLYING POLICE DEPT DON'T ALREADY HAVE DRONES
Quite a few 1 and dones that are pro-walk as well. Hmmmmmm.
see my response to your comment about drone costs
[–] 17832685? ago
Maybe listen to OP for once and just not say it you opsec breaking fag?
>>13074244
Okay OP it is time to stop and move on to >>>>/polk/ or >>>/fascist/ we have too many (((antifa-ggots))) here