0
1

[–] 17773085? [S] 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

SB2 is great, he persuaded me that code was in the tweets on

W-Here Comes the Pain. I admire his work.

But I do my decodes without any reference at all to Q drops. Whether someone believes in Q is irrelevant to my decodes.

Of course I follow Q fairly closely to learn what is going on. I find Q credible. But that is exactly the conversation I want to keep out of discussion of my decodes.

No one can accuse me of being a Qtard because my decodes are completely without reference to Q, unless "Q" or "17" appear in the coded material.


0
0

[–] 17788760? [S] ago 

Have you translated anything about the US sinking a UUK/UN ship ?

Or the real-time trap in the NZ Christchurch incident ?

These are sincere questions, I do not listen to all off SB2's work even though I admire him.

0
0

[–] 17790157? ago  (edited ago)

https://voat.co/v/QRV/3133080 This is worth reading about NZ.

I translated most of SB2's articles. It is all in his archive. The last one: https://www.serial.rocks/post-152

0
0

[–] 17790901? [S] ago 

I understand you translate, that's why you should be easily answer my question

if SB2 had anything on US forces sinking a British ship,

or had started looking at lower case letters in Trump tweets.

or if he noticed anything prior to February 23 about AMAZON AIR and ATLAS AF from MIAMI

This is not to invalidate, it just to see if SB2 methods get any of the results I have gotten .

0
0

[–] 17790870? [S] ago 

I am not in opposition to SB2. I admire him.

But my methods give me good results, and I am well satisfied with them.

I would appreciate it if you would answer my questions; My questions are quite specific, and you would be in position to answer them.

Best