0
1

[–] 17762567? 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

That is quite the statement by IPBA. Big deal! All it does is express their displeasure over the way this was handled. If they wanted to add any meat to the bones, they would have included actions that could be, and would be, taken on their part to counter this gross manifestation of injustice!

0
0

[–] 17762769? ago 

They may still be considering actions. It doesn't have to be in this statement to be so.

Not that I'm counting on that, the opposite really. But to be intellectually honest we have to say they could be considering further action.

They won't.

[–] [deleted] ago 

[Deleted]

0
0

[–] 17763929? ago 

It's not about a particular person; it is about undermining the process, the rule of law. Truly understand your frustration, my son as well.

0
0

[–] 17762315? ago 

Please link the original document. Thanks.

(It's vastly easier to convince others when I can send them a link to a source that isn't anonymous from a message board)

0
0

[–] 17762382? ago 

Link to ILPBA website and article: http://www.ilpba.org/announcements/7249825/

0
0

[–] 17762408? ago 

Ty sir.