0
1

[–] 17762743? 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago  (edited ago)

And yet no call for an investigation into what is an obvious case of politically influenced corruption (IOW, all those things they said she did that were irregular and ethically very bad, she had to have a motivation for doing it - and what about the court judge involved in this sealing?)

And will remark that would bet a $1000 that when they say "victims of hate crimes" - they weren't talking about the actual victims of Smollett's hoax, i.e., the Trump MAGA base that he was targeting with his particular hate crime.

They had in mind the traditional Leftist image of minorities as hate crime victims - that Smollett's hoax will tend to have such cases in the future taken less seriously. They could care less about the current victims of this very obvious hate crime.

[–] [deleted] ago 

[Deleted]

0
0

[–] 17763929? ago 

It's not about a particular person; it is about undermining the process, the rule of law. Truly understand your frustration, my son as well.

0
1

[–] 17763144? 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

"We strongly encourage our members and the public to review the National District Attorneys Associations statement on prosecutorial best practices in high profile cases."

THAT'S ALL YOU WANT, Lee Roupas? FUCKING COWARDS... THEY ARE IN ON IT AS MUCH AS ANYONE ELSE.

0
0

[–] 17763867? ago 

This and events like this I believe, are part of the plan. This proves that we can not prosecute any of the DS gang within American courts, especially in the big blue cities where a lot of our favorite gang would be tried once their corruption is brought to light. This is showing the need to have these traitors dealt with, within the military tribunal system.

0
0

[–] 17764344? ago 

I hope this backfires on them most magnificently. Dark to Light.

0
0

[–] 17764415? ago 

This is not just about lying or wasting police resources.

This is a knowingly planned effort to fan the flames on a race war to destabilize America. This is sedition or treason or both. And it applies to his handlers and protectors

0
0

[–] 17765905? [S] ago 

It’s about all three.

0
0

[–] 17767400? ago 

And the third one, is just leaps and bounds more relevant than the first 2, but no one is talking about the elephant in the room!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

0
0

[–] 17765314? ago 

Smollette knows about the chicago/hollywood human sex trafficking ties and threatened some very high up names that immediatly drew a "nothing to see here" from prosecutors.

0
0

[–] 17765885? [S] ago 

That was my conclusion as well. I can’t help but wonder whether the cover up was a smoke screen to protect the FBI investigation and the corrupt cops outted it or if it was corrupt prosecutors covering his ass for no legitimate reason. With what we know, it could go either way.

0
0

[–] 17765374? ago  (edited ago)

This is a LOT OF HEAT to take all to get an Anti-Lynching Bill passed ? Huge exposure potential from the start , all this for a Bill ( Now Law ? ) Why didn't it pass the first time ? Seems to me we need to dig into this. : EDIT : It seems to me this is an effort for "Reparations" to be made to African Americans and to tie up the Courts in litigation to me. They did this all to get their hands on another slush fund and cause Judicial Chaos ? https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/senate-bill/3178/text/es Peace Y

0
0

[–] 17765814? [S] ago 

I can’t immagine it passed the senate or that DJT would sign it.

0
0

[–] 17773348? ago 

It passed the Senate , under pressure due to Smollett case. I haven't heard that the President has signed or vetoed the Bill. Peace Y

load more comments ▼ (3 remaining)