0
0

[–] BCKeeper ago 

The Curcio Hearings – Last Chance For Defendants To Protect Themselves

0
0

[–] Wazhappenin1 [S] ago 

A Curcio Hearing is basically a hearing before the judge to resolve any conflicts of interest so as to protect the defendant in terms of his legal representation

0
1

[–] lifeduringwartime 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

The judge is on it.

0
1

[–] Wazhappenin1 [S] 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Hopefully they have nothing on the judge!

0
0

[–] lifeduringwartime ago 

Other way around It seems, judging from the one-liners.

0
1

[–] Wazhappenin1 [S] 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

THE COURT: That's it. Okay. Thank you very much. Everyone. Well, I'm going to renew the motion but with respect to the questions that I ask if counsel or Curcio counsel believes that any question would create a prejudice we can is an a sidebar as to whether the question should be answered in public or whether it should be answered in private and then I'll rule on any particular request to seal an or to maintain part of the colloquy outside the hearing of the public. But I will say this that all of the other Curcio hearings here have been held in public and there's not been any problem with that. The problems that may exist for others that are not the concern of this Court. What's going on in the Southern District is not the concern of this Court. What's going on in California is not the concern of this court. What I'm concerned about is to that when you answer my questions you tell the truth and that you give a fulsome answer to I have question so that we don't come back a week later and find out that there's more that I need to know that is relevant to the questions I've asked that I haven't been told. So and we'll see what that S we'll start with Ms. Bronfman why doesn't she come up with her Curcio counsel.