0
0

[–] 17674536? ago 

Who cares, we still have 8chan, the last place on the internet where you can tell kikes to suck your dick since they obviously want to

0
0

[–] 17674540? ago 

So are they going to ban Black Nationalism now too?

lol

0
0

[–] 17675555? ago 

It's ok to say asian countries should stay asian

It's banned to say white countries should stay white

Lawsuit when? This one sided applying of rules is racial discrimination.

0
0

[–] 17675556? ago 

Shitpost White victims of black crimes nonstop. Easy to get hundreds of accounts for fagbook.

0
0

[–] 17677993? ago 

How hard is it to gain access to boomer's facebook profiles and use their profiles to cause all the mayhem?

0
0

[–] 17675561? ago 

Facebook should ban all white people, period

0
0

[–] 17675562? ago 

This is going to result in bloodshed.

0
0

[–] 17675564? ago 

remember…

0
0

[–] 17675568? ago 

Its inevitable. You can't tell 200 million people 'you have no right to exist' and think there won't be consequences.

0
0

[–] 17676680? ago 

This is going to result in bloodshed.

Oh dear, what a shame for ZOG

0
0

[–] 17675570? ago 

This is the letter to Facebook from the "experts":

https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/4910674-Letter-From-LCCRUL-to-Facebook.html

So if all you have to do is show Facebook some citations from "academics" and "experts" that there isn't a distinction between a prohibited category ("white supremacy") and a non-prohibited category ("white nationalism" or "white separatism") to get speech you don't like banned, how about sending copies of Malcolm X's writings or Marcus Garvey's showing that the history of "black nationalism" and "black separatism" is inherently and inextricably linked to "black supremacy?" They literally believed whites were the devil and had to be killed.

Not only that, since the "experts" cite Brown v. Board of Education, which was a bullshit case establishing "separate but equal" based on nothing at all except fake doll tests (where black children prefer to play with white dolls–the experiment was since discredited yet somehow the Supreme Court decision still stands) suddenly matter when we're talking an entirely new white nation that isn't under US law? US law and Brown v. Board have absolutely no bearing on calls for a completely new nation separate from the United States where US law will not apply. There may be some principles taken from US law, but Brown will certainly not be among them.

Long screed here, and I could go on, but the point is, the reasoning is complete horseshit when you break it down.

TL;DR This is censoring any advocacy for white civil rights. This is more proof that we need a new white nation, because they're making any advocacy for white rights impossible.

0
0

[–] 17675576? ago 

This is more proof that we need a new white nation

No, we need the SAME white Nation, ruled by Whites.

To get that, first you have to get rid of jews.

0
0

[–] 17675577? ago 

I can agree to that, but the legal framework will have to be modified heavily.

0
0

[–] 17679062? ago 

how about sending copies of Malcolm X's writings or Marcus Garvey's showing that the history of "black nationalism" and "black separatism" is inherently and inextricably linked to "black supremacy?" They literally believed whites were the devil and had to be killed.

No you aren't thinking. What you got to do, and this was actually done in the past, is link black supremacy to white supremacy. COINTELPRO fucked up various efforts of black nationalists and white nationalists to come together in the past. Make them believe all black nationalists are white supremacists trying to preserve the white race through apartheid. It's basically true.

0
0

[–] 17675579? ago 

facebook bans the 10 commandments. if any of you find his address, open fire on his whole family.

load more comments ▼ (74 remaining)