<Getting there slowly gives us more time to red pill before the censorship becomes too severe. Accelerating to the point that we have no freedom and we're a minority in our own nations and we're being killed is no good when we don't have the numbers to fight back (like in SA).
You have it backwards. By the time that "the censorship gets too severe" we will already be all those things. The very point of accelerating now is that we still have the numbers, the guns etc. We won't have them in 20 years' time.
<We need to wake people up before it's too late. Good acceleration is when the people are oppressed without justifications first and are willing to rebel and have their guns and aren't a minority yet.
You think they're dumb enough to just randomly force people to wear a goyim patch or something? They've been drip-feeding all the justifications they need to the future generations through the system. We are hopelessly outclassed by their propaganda machine, and so must seek to bring down the system itself. Their is no "good" or "bad" accelerationism; there is only the eventuality of collapse, and the question of how soon it will happen.
<We should only attack them when the general public is at the point of accepting it. The enemy must instigate it first. Otherwise normies will not see it as justified and will still sympathize with them as victims.
Literally the definition of an optics cuck. Violence is at the heart of our ideology, because it is at the heart of nature.
Look at that normie NPC NGO shill post with the first image that came up on a search engine.
If you're not a shill then post some Patrick Little. Shills can't post pat. So why not pat post?
[–] 17656996? ago
Yeah, they don't.
They are fucking scared by it.
[–] 17657001? ago
I agree. If the jews wanted white men comitting attrocities we would be the ones receiving crates of guns and bombs coupled with cia guerilla training. not muslims
[–] 17687175? ago
They only need a couple of attacks to justify censorship not an entire army, moron, or they can just false flag it (like they did).
>>13030267
No, they don't. They have plenty of money and power and most of all these (see pics).
No, when westerners started to retaliate against Islamic terrorist attacks of the past, all they did was throw a pigs head at a mosque (harmless stuff) which led to them being incarcerated.
>>13030473
When did he say it didn't happen? It happened but it was a false flag. The CGI and crisis actors thing is disinfo. Why are you trying to conflate false flag believers with disinfo, shill?
>>13030661
The (((gun-grabbers))) we're talking about are the (((deep state))) and they'll use false flags like they usually do.
We banned more shills before kampfy was removed (after an astroturfed smear campaign) from power. All sorts of faggot shills like MGTOW and such showed up once he was kicked.
That buzz only serves (((their))) agenda when the only thing people see are pro tarrant shill threads on the first page.