0
0

[–] 17658199? ago 

It's clear to anyone with brains that the only ones to benefit from this are the gun grabbers. Nobody is inspired to fight immigration because of some guy gunning down defenseless muslims.

0
0

[–] 17687164? ago 

that's operating on two assumptions on your part. You assume:

the muslims would not have attacked unless there was an attack on them, which ignores the fact that the mosque Brenton attacked was affiliated with salafism with two white kiwi converts going to yemen to fight, and die, in jihad in yemen. This cements the idea that they were dangerous without regard to time or political volatility.

the gun-grabbers, which is a popular political position in both ozzie and kiwi lands, wouldn't make excuses to take firearms away from their citizens.

What you're saying doesn't gel with the actual political situation in both countries.

>>13029967

clearly, you don't understand the culture of /pol/. we've never been ones for censorship. Methinks you trying to suggest this place would be better off destroyed, instead of realizing the amount of traffic from the constant buzz of it's userbase, makes me suspect you are a shill or some sort.

0
0

[–] 17658206? ago 

It's clear to anyone with brains that the only ones to benefit from this are the gun grabbers.

You've failed to make such an argument in a strong fashion, and those two sentences still matter more than every post you've made in this thread combined.

Nobody is inspired to fight immigration because of some guy gunning down defenseless muslims.

Yeah, that's why the gov is so fucking desperate to keep anyone from seeing the video or reading the manifesto. SEEMS LEGIT.

You have no integrity.

0
0

[–] 17658216? ago 

Yeah, that's why the gov is so fucking desperate to keep anyone from seeing the video or reading the manifesto. SEEMS LEGIT.

The government knows that in this day and age censorship only causes things to spread. Streisand effect.