[–] 17629750? 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Much like national socialism has nothing to do with (((socialism))), standing up and defending our interests has nothing to do with your shitty marxist (((accelerationism))) ideology, even if some anons use the word "accelerationism." I see lefty shills like dogs trying to purposely play words games and mislead anons into your shitty marxist / anarchist version of this, but nobody is buying it no matter how hard you keep shilling it.
Any ideology that seeks to reject the state is pretty suspect, as the state is the organizing body of the nation. People who advocate for anarchism are just childish retards who are afraid of any authority, discipline or organization. Who will build roads? Who will defend the nation? Who will ensure that degenerates aren’t allowed to run free? Anarchism would be even more open to Jewish subversion than democracy is.
I never equated fascism to anarchism. But in Mussolini's own words
Fascism desires the state to be strong and organic
A State based on millions of individuals who recognize its authority, feel its action, and are ready to serve its ends
The Fascist State is not indifferent to religious phenomena in general
The fascist belief system requires, essentially, blind devotion to the faith that the State is actually working towards the fulfillment of the nation's spiritual essence. It will in similar fashion become outmoded or be co-opted like other religious institutions. It also requires the punishment of heresies as a result, otherwise the faith is society can become compromised- compromising the State itself.
Unlike the children who get triggered over wordism, I don't really care that much about what I am called. Only what is the result of my struggle against the jew. But I will address some points you make.
Anarchy is firstly defined as a rejection of government.
I reject (((government)))
Just government is fine. But (((government))) is evil and should be overthrown.
This is less of a "class" struggle than a racial one. Class is just a made up construct that can be defined and redefined to suit whatever brainlet ideology you want. Most Americans think they're middle class. Thus, class is entirely a perception.
Race on the otherhand is real and colours all facets of life.
Something about freedom
Regurgitating an elite class into a new system seems like the path towards despotism. Unless you manage to annihilate all racial enemies the fundamentals of fascism will inevitably fail to protect the race.
Many anarchists are actually federalists since that is the least coercive form of organization over a large scale. If you think about democracy also being self-rule, then the Americans were very anarchist until the Articles were taken down.
[–] 17629758? 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Room temperature IQ. It doesn't matter what kind of label you put on the new form of government which will serve the interest of Europeans. Respecting individual freedoms or having a thriving economy is even secondary (if a Western government is truly serving the interests of its people, then the country will be prosperous no matter what).
We are under attack, plain and simple, and winning this war is a matter of survival. If we do not fight, then our people will vanish completely, other than small irrelevant and impoverished communities. Left, right, anarchism, statism, whatever. We are long past the point of discussing political systems.