[–]17604874?0 points
0 points
0 points
(+0|-0)
ago
I have no information about BT other than what he wrote about in his manifesto and from memory he gave some money to some people whom he liked their ideas but wasn't a member of any group so if this is true it might be that there is no complicity [or worse] in the people around/met BT. I find it hard to believe anyone would know about the possibility of this crime and not try to put a stop to it or contact the police, unless they were complicit in the crime… though in saying that there's plenty of hypotheticals that would negate what I've asserted.
I just want to be real clear about this: the facts need to speak to/for the crime and the earlier people assist the police with their investigation the clearer it is for them and the sooner innocent people will be cleared. If you have nothing to do with BT you have no reason to contact police and you've done nothing wrong (at least until wrong think is a crime and that does seem to be coming).
You argument of, 'you're a cuck for collaborating with police' is silly particularly because you think it would 'endanger' nat-soc groups when so far it seems BT was by himself. So the aim of contacting police is to simply clear yourself of any wrongdoing.
Cops in this case can suck my dick. They're cucking for Muslim invaders and thus they can disappear for all I care.
[–] 17604874? ago
Cops in this case can suck my dick. They're cucking for Muslim invaders and thus they can disappear for all I care.
>>13014173
Schizo.
BT is an acronym. Your logic makes 0 sense.
[–] 17604885? ago
Ooh big man. Bet you stay past bedtime every night.
[–] 17604887? ago
Being self-employed, this is indeed true.