Say what you like about Spencer and where the term (((alt right))) ended up
but i do think he was right on his basic premise of "uniting the right" under one ethno nationalistic banner
This doesnt mean we should compromise on our core beliefs such as
race realism
JQ
sexual realism
ect
but that we should be willing to accept a viraity of opinion on those that meet with us on this points
basically that we dont devolve in to gay infighting over what color our banners are or how individual socio economic policies should be specifically implemented, with obvious exceptions at the extremes of marxism and central banking
If we have learned anything over the past 3 years, it has been that a mass of "pro white" people is incapable of changing anything. The alt-right camp Spencer has championed is filled to the brim with all kinds of degenerates. The only effective solution is a group with clear values and motivations. NSDAP is a good example. They were zero compromise and made the other right-wing parties bow.
It's more complicated than that. Hitler did a lot of good things for his nation, like revitalizing the economy, preserving their cultural traditions, and ending central banking practices. Churchill is on record saying that he was going to force Hitler into a war one way or another. Also the Nazis effectively stopped the USSR from spreading further east and taking over more of western Europe which wouldn't have been good.
Additionally, although it will stir controversy, I have come to believe that in certain
cycles of a culture or civilization, polygamy is a preferable lifestyle. To name only two
examples, (1) when through war the male population is decimated, then common sense
and nature's laws demand that wombs be filled, or (2) in the abomination of a multi-racial
society, if a White man of energy and ability can support many wives and thereby keep
White girls from mating with racial aliens. Furthermore, since I fear the tyranny of
religious and governmental oppression as much as anything on earth, I believe that the
marital arrangements of the Folk should not be subject to regulation. The primary
concern must be that men support and take responsibility for mates and offspring. I don't
want to rush to judgment, but it appears that the whole women's liberation movement was
flawed. Maybe eons of time in which males protected tribe and territory while women
tended hearth and home have created differences in which women usually see individuals
rather than the whole race or tribe. Whatever the reason, the decades since women were
"liberated" have castrated our males and led us to the brink of extinction.
We cannot, however, absolve our men from blame. It was they, too, who swallowed the
Zionist propaganda and it was they who abandoned defense of territorial imperatives that
in turn led to the abyss. I will continue to hope that the beauty of our women can be
preserved. Of course, as long as I breathe I will continue to fight for a future for our
children. So let me end this tome with one more repetition of the 14 WORDS which I
hope will become the most sacred in history.
"We must secure the existence of our people and a future for White children."
[–] 17542146? ago
Keep following the example of the Hero Brenton Tarrant, like many of us are already doing. Kill as many enemies as you can. Kill their children. Kill their women. Kill their elderly.
Kill jews, shitskins, liberals and faggots.
[–] 17556234? ago
I didn't notice any new white-made terrorist attack in the news over the last week?
Did you guys?
[–] 17556237? ago
If a retard goes out to shoot up a mosque in the near future with short-sighted planning and the spooks assassinate him, the shilling has worked.