Read the thread. The general consesus seems to be that some consider it to just be a way of saying full-on NatSoc, while others consider it to be exclusively Lane's 88 Precepts, or both.
It doesn't matter really. Both are beneficial and learning the 88 Precepts is something most do once they have the gist of what this is all about but would like to go a little more advanced on their journey to the truth.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9faQSS7TufI
NZ SHOOTING GLOBAL ZIO PSYOP
KIKES DESPERATE FOR DISTRACTION
USING NIGGERBRAIN SHITSKINS TO SET OFF ANTI-CHRISTIAN VIOLENCE
USING TRAITORS TO PUSH MORE FIREARMS LAWS
this spamarino disavows the claim that inbred shitskin invaders being killed is bad
88 is how we accomplish 14; that's pretty much the whole point of National Socialism after all.
Most 'ordinary' people can't handle 88 just yet, so unless you want to lose your livelihood and social standing you should keep the 88 at home. If you do go 88 in public, just don't make an ass of yourself. It should also be understood that anyone who publicly stands for the 14 words will be labelled an 88er and will eventually come to realize the truth of my first sentence.
14/88
14: “We must secure the existence of our people and a future for white children.”
14:"Because the beauty of the White Aryan woman must not perish from the earth."
88: The 88 precepts of David Lane
88: Heil Hitler
Most commonly (from what I have seen): We must secure the existence of our people and a future for White children. Heil Hitler.
There is literally not one National Socialist reference in the 88 precepts. Anti 88 precepts people are 99% of the time cuck optics faggots who haven't even read them. It seems to promote non democratic republic form of government. Very autistically anti big government to a point I'd honestly say is an anti fascist position.
The 88 precepts are pretty simple. They are just statements of observable reality such as rights don't exist, democracy is bad, White race needs to not racemix among many other topics. A few I have slight disagreements with but I know where the statement is coming from so I get it.
[–] 17528927? ago
Doesn't matter, do it all.
This is a sneaky whitepill. We're already hated by mainstream sources and no optics will change ((controlled))) media perceptions.
Be the face, hands, or heart. Just commit to it and pursue. Shilling aside, they fear us because we've woken up so many millennial and zoomer anons already. Take a step back and consider how different the dialogue is today versus even a year ago.
We're winning.
It shouldn't ever be a "big tent". We have a singular goal but every avenue that is currently being pursued is working. Tarrant proved that even the accels are right. As long as they aren't semitic or pro-semitic, every approach is valid.
That's it.