0
0

[–] 17601816? ago 

This is such a gay argument

14 - Understandable, logical, appeal to right of existence

88 - WW2, leather boots, 6 million dead Jews

No amount of arguing "b-but optics don't matter" is going to change this perception right now when action is needed

0
0

[–] 17848952? ago 

See

>>12994791

Lets get back on topic.

We can discuss about war another time.

0
0

[–] 17601820? ago 

poland had every reason to ally witj the germans.

Holy fucking shit my dude read! He was purposely replaced by a puppet and then inact violence against civilizans on dransig, along with british propaganda to go along with it. Not including the fact the Soviets were already invading poland weeks before tje germans. You seriously need to lurk moar.

>>13012451

0
0

[–] 17601808? ago 

Manifesto

0
0

[–] 17601806? ago 

I've read the manifesto and it seems that the answer to the question is very simple: He is pro-white, not pro Greater Nazi Reich.

0
0

[–] 17599589? ago 

0
0

[–] 17599583? ago 

0
0

[–] 17848950? ago 

>>13012090

Got a lazy shill who cant into memes

And another who still cannot understand what socialism means in hitler terms or germany and does not understand the context of language.

0
0

[–] 17599574? ago 

I think we'll just let the local idiot find all sorts of reasons for Germany to do nothing, trousers down, bending over, letting Germans be pwned, robbed, tortured and killed, and Europe be owned by Bolsheviks and Jews.

Germany war wrong!

WRONG

0
0

[–] 17599565? ago 

Food for thought and to see who did everything possible to go to war

https://wearswar.wordpress.com/2017/08/26/did-jews-fake-hitlers-master-race-phrase-to-create-war-world-domination/

Few quotations

Gen. Robert E. Wood stated at a Senate committee that Churchill had said to him in November 1936,

“Germany is getting too strong, and we must smash her.”

Churchill also stated in the year 1936,

“We will force Hitler into war, whether he wants it or not.”[5]

0
0

[–] 17599566? ago 

… okay

That does not address anything that I wrote.

I'll restate my core point; Going to war with Poland was a mistake. Hitler did lose the war, after all.

0
0

[–] 17599571? ago 

If one naive reader were to read your input, he'd be convinced that Germany is the originator of about every single aggressive behavior and was first in showing signs of willing conflict. When all lights were green showing that neighboring countries operating as proxies for the Jews were preparing for war. About every single provocation and aggression by the future Allies wouldn't count, some of them literally involving economical aggression or physical damage. These don't count. Only the "warmongering" of Germany is to be noted. Despite the very fact that Hitler, contrary to the Jews' puppets, did not want that war.

Let's just ignore that the League of Nations did everything possible to stop Poland from mistreating Germans. It was perfectly clear, they all knew what was going on.

Czechoslovakia was an obvious spearhead that would be used against Germany. The Sudetenland was a logical piece of land to grab, mostly populated by Germans, and necessary for the military assets that fell into German hands as a consequence. It was a smart move. It was legitimate considering the population living there. What would the Poles say? They too with Ukraine seized some land from the corpse of that artificial "Czechoslovakia". In no way they could hold an annexation against Germany on moral grounds. If we go back to Poland, we see that absolutely nothing was done to save the Germans from atrocities. The Allies foiled all attempts to solve this problem peacefully. They were the biggest hypocrites of the lot.

>>13010431

I'll restate my core point; Going to war with Poland was a mistake. Hitler did lose the war, after all.

So if he had won it would have not been a mistake? Well, that's one of the flimsiest criteria one could retain against the legitimacy if not necessity of a conflict, especially when said conflict's outcome was not a foregone conclusion.

Besides, you go from "starting the war" to "going to war with Poland", which conveniently removes the US very real moves against Germany.

I'm not sure where we're going with this. You may be bitter that Germany lost, I don't know, I could understand that.

0
0

[–] 17599563? ago 

They clearly showed their will to go to war by breaking the Ten Year non-Aggression Plan formerly signed between Germany and Poland under Marshall Pilsudski.

That and the warmongering and provocative speeches held by Polish authorities.

If one will claim the official declaration counts as identifying the starter of a war, then you need to consider Britain and France as starters.

0
0

[–] 17599564? ago 

They clearly showed their will to go to war by breaking the Ten Year non-Aggression Plan formerly signed between Germany and Poland under Marshall Pilsudski.

You mean the one Hitler revoked on April 28th?

That and the warmongering and provocative speeches held by Polish authorities.

Made in response to German ones.

If one will claim the official declaration counts as identifying the starter of a war, then you need to consider Britain and France as starters.

Maybe so, but if we're interested in truth we'd look at both German and Polish provocations. Not just Polish ones.

I've criticized Polish stubbornness but let's not pretend that Hitler's shit smelled like roses. Remember, just one month before Hitler broke his non-aggression pact with Poland he had invaded and annexed Czechoslovakia in violation of his own promise to respect Czech sovereignty.

You know, up until then it was pretty clear that Hitler just wanted a German state for Germans. But then he annexed a nation that was not German after promising not to.

I want you to ask yourself; How does this look to Poland when Hitler comes to them demanding not only German land back, but a corridor 1 kilometer wide across yoru own land in exchange for Hitler's "promise" (for real bro) to respect Polish borders… and then he breaks his own non-aggression pact with you. What would you do? Just hand over your land for nothing?

load more comments ▼ (100 remaining)