As I said before, it is a nation.
it is not.
A state composed of one people.
it is not
The German nation existed long before the state
it did not
and despite your claims, the Germans of Austria and the Germans of the rest of Germany are indeed one people with a common culture, history, and blood.
you are wrong. just look at the language
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bavarian_language
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alemannic_German
and then you have standard german. which is created langue and not dialect. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standard_German
germans do not exist as cohesive group of people. prove me wrong
hen you make retarded statements, no one will take you seriously.
but that is not retarded statements. just ask any austrian. or german who is living in bavaria. i did and that is a reason why i am trying to explain this to you. it is not my opinion. it is a known fact. i really do not know how can i explain this more clearly. just ask somebody else. but not new immigrants…of course.
Do you know what a nation is?
A nation is a stable community of people, formed on the basis of a common language, territory, history, ethnicity, or psychological make-up manifested in a common culture. A nation is distinct from a people,[1] and is more abstract, and more overtly political, than an ethnic group
well..i stand corrected. germany is nation. by this definition.
[–] 17530598? ago
In 1870 nearly every German country enthusiastically united with Prussia to form the 2nd Reich. They all saw themselves as one people.
Then in the Anschluss the Austrians nearly unanimously voted to join the German Reich. Clearly they saw themselves as German.
>>12990164
Nope, even in my most bluepilled days I always thought he wanted what was good for Germany, just that his idea of what was good for them was questionable.
Because he took a few jewesses from them to wife? They don't hate that, they love that, their foremost female role model is Esther, famous for getting a powerful king to slaughter their enemies…
Arguing Stalin wasn't theirs is like arguing Lee Harvey Oswald wasn't theirs. Just because they killed him after his usefulness was up doesn't mean they didn't love having him around while it lasted.
Now, to put an end to your nazbol bullshit, here it is straight from the horses mouth:
https://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/stalin/works/1931/01/12.htm
<National and racial chauvinism is a vestige of the misanthropic customs characteristic of the period of cannibalism. Anti-semitism, as an extreme form of racial chauvinism, is the most dangerous vestige of cannibalism.
<Anti-semitism is of advantage to the exploiters as a lightning conductor that deflects the blows aimed by the working people at capitalism. Anti-semitism is dangerous for the working people as being a false path that leads them off the right road and lands them in the jungle. Hence Communists, as consistent internationalists, cannot but be irreconcilable, sworn enemies of anti-semitism.
<In the U.S.S.R. anti-semitism is punishable with the utmost severity of the law as a phenomenon deeply hostile to the Soviet system. Under U.S.S.R. law active anti-semites are liable to the death penalty.
<J. Stalin
<January 12, 1931
<First published in the newspaper Pravda, No. 329, November 30, 1936
[–] 17530601? ago
then why people from bavaria call them self bavarian and not german. they say they are from germany but they are bavarian
>>12991408
no, because he destroyed their plans.
>>12991408
i am not claiming he had anything against jews or that he prosecuted them. well, he did at the end of his life but that is a different story. i am only claiming that he had different polices than international jews and that is a reason qhy jews hate him