He had to attack the soviets, because soviets would've attacked him. This is fact if you have read about Stalin and his personality and outlook on things.
it is not a fact. it is asumption. at the time 3 reich had treaty with soviet union. also, at the time soviet union was (only?) country that was willing to trade with 3 reich. row materials and oil were flowing from soviet union to germany at the time when other country had embargo on trading with germany. it could be said that hitler attacked his only ally..or at least only country that was willing to trade with him. all this at the same time when as you say:
Hitler gave many chances for brits to make peace. He liked anglos and thought they shouldn't be at war.
jews were running at the time UK. and US. and he did not attack them.
[–] 17526581? ago
After the military build-up, its full scale only realized after its preemption and the SU attacking ALL of its neighbors, their clear stated intention to conquer the world, that was no question.
Why exactly was there a massive military build up for 50 years NATO, if the SU was no danger?
[–] 17526620? ago
tough question ? maybe because NATO is mercenaries for jews who are going around and waging wars for their masters ? libya ? syria ? should i continue ?