0
0

[–] 17512955? ago  (edited ago)

Oh yes you do. It's okay though, carry on pretending that you don't; stick with being a puppet.

Anyone else reading who happens to follow up, will know what I'm talking about. You're clearly not interested and/or not smart enough to figure it out.

Next robotic insult/talking point, kgo.

0
0

[–] 17513021? ago 

What does this have to do with the jew censoring?

Spit it out elmer fudd.

That's right. Nothing. You have nothing but red herrings.

0
0

[–] 17513272? ago  (edited ago)

Spit it out elmer fudd.

Y'know, if you'd left it at that I might be more inclined to share more, but because you just can't help yourself, this is all you get:

Look at the timing, look at the pretext created by the shooter, look to the Utrecht shooting too, remember your own question:

Are they being directed by someone else?

Look at one of the things I said in a previous reply:

Ultimately, both sides are being played like fiddles

("both sides" being in reference to the "Blame Jews!" and "Blame Nazis!" crowds)

Ask yourself, who benefits the most from this argument between those two sides?

Your first answer might be "Jews/Israel", but, that's just feeding the argument. Who gets a free pass while the world is distracted? Who is it that manages to avoid being discussed?

Why?

What is their connection to "Jews" and "Nazis"?

I've now given you plenty to get started, the rest requires you to research beyond the scope of "Jews".