[–] 17481686? ago (edited ago)
Which is really funny when you think about it.
Companies that are advertising should sell their products to customers, i.e. Fox News viewers. If the advertisers are not selling to those viewers (seriously Fox News viewers are a clear demographic that would simplify advertising) then who are the advertisers really selling to and who are the advertising companies’ real customers? In other words, where do the advertisers really make their money from?
Either the advertising corporations have been subverted and are not serving the interests of their shareholders for political reasons or no company has the need to advertise products to the Fox News viewer demographic.
Since it is unlikely to be the later, the truth is probably closer to the former. This is good news from a business perspective. It means that there is a huge opportunity for innovation and competition in the advertising market and we can destroy the legacy advertisers.
“To the angel of the church in Laodicea write:
These are the words of the Amen, the faithful and true witness, the ruler of God’s creation. 15 I know your deeds, that you are neither cold nor hot. I wish you were either one or the other! 16 So, because you are lukewarm—neither hot nor cold—I am about to spit you out of my mouth.
[–] 17481806? ago
https://files.catbox.moe/7khisy.png :
'It was Jan. 12, and President Trump had called in to Pirro’s Saturday night program on Fox News. '
'Fox News also wants to avoid angering the legions of Trump fans who tune in for the overreaching commentary. '
'Apologies, though -- they’re not good business; they’re a sign of weakness, as the No. 1 fan of Fox News believes. '
'For President Trump, watching Fox News bump Pirro was like watching a hurricane sweep through a safe harbor:Which is to say: Keep it up with the hateful language!'
'Just how much does Trump appreciate Pirro’s assistance on Fox News?'
This has been an automated message.