0
0

[–] 17630693? ago 

this is kinda offtopic because I'm not interested in his cum but I wonder if we could gather up a group of anons and pay him a visit once the dust has settled a little bit, we could very well say that we're his friends

0
0

[–] 17629821? ago 

This is the most aspergers thing I've ever read

0
0

[–] 17629817? ago 

I'm pro Tarrant, so don't take this the wrong way, but its kinda gay to be worried about another man's cum and where it goes.

0
0

[–] 17629820? ago 

Uh, you got some white stuff on your hair on the left…

0
0

[–] 17629818? ago 

really? so eugenics means nothing to you?

0
0

[–] 17629812? ago 

Sheesh, leave it to a group of white incels to talk about another mans cum. We all know you phaggets would open wide for the chance to cum taste and test for 100% verification that it's truly his.

0
0

[–] 17626726? ago 

How about New Zealanders grow a pair like Tarrant and storm the prison and break him out

0
0

[–] 17626721? ago 

0
0

[–] 17629811? ago 

pic 4 did NOT age well

0
0

[–] 17622139? ago 

I swear to g*d the larping gets weirder and weirder each passing month.

0
0

[–] 17622141? ago 

Whatever you say kike ;)

You know the words are not for you because you will never understand them anyway since you are a material creation and have no connection to the spiritual or higher realms.

0
0

[–] 17622137? ago 

As Leibniz will later point out in his Monadology;

<82. As for minds, or rational souls [see 29]: I stand by my view, just expressed,

that basically there is the same thing in all living things and animals so that both

the soul and the animal begin only when the world begins, and never come to an

end, any more than the world does; but I maintain that there is something special

to be said about rational animals, as follows. Their little spermatic animals, to the

extent that they are no more than that, have only ordinary souls, ones that can

feel; but when the select few come, through an act of conception, to have the

nature of a human being, their feeling souls are raised to the level of reason, and

to the privileges of minds.

Is it reasonable to cast aside these privileges of the reasoning mind to better speculate on

something that is chaotic, fluid and ever-changing in its nature or shall we focus on those

privileges that are the gift of the reason of the Rational and conscious mind?

Observer as Subject; the Shifting Material Construct.

It could be said that we are all contending on a personal battleground, one of thought and reason,

one that will either define mankind as sensory animal churning him as flotsam on a ceaseless

chaotic sea of the material apparatus or something yet to be born into conscious

understanding of greater things; the birth then, so to speak, of the Observer or he

who is triumphant, Transcendent Man. Do we choose to entertain

the simulation aspect of mind-body theory and apply ourselves diligently to coherence with that

which remains steadfast within this tempest of the material realm? For if consciousness is not an

aspect of the shifting material nature of the universe what can be said of the sensual experience

or of their merits?

If John Locke’s argument within the realm of Empiricist thought of mankind as a tabula

rasa was correct there would the merit of infinite variety within man’s sensual experience.

Perhaps, with this infinite variety, we would never have been capable of thinking consistently

enough to develop such things as language, for all mankind would be drowning in a vast and

heavy sea of variety and sensual experiences without any coherence other than a prison of his

own solipsism or internal reflection.

load more comments ▼ (41 remaining)