<If you believe we need to correct the white birth rates, why didn’t you start a family and do it yourself?
<Because if we do not destroy the invaders first, our own birthrates will mean nothing. We do not have the birth rates to fight them at their game, nor should we as it is ultimately destructive to nature and culture. So I took matters into my own hands
implying that those invaders won't inevitably use the same tactics, causing an even greater hit to the population
Vico has an interesting quote about this while discussing Descartes proposition that "I think therefore I am."
While Vico couches this in an etymology, he does provide another justification for it. Descartes famously used "I think therefore I am" to provide a first principle that refutes skepticism. Vico claims that this does not work because it does not entirely address the challenge of the skeptics. The skeptic knows that he or she exists. The skeptic does not, however, know anything significant about that existence because the skeptic cannot know the cause of his or her ideas (AW 55). The verum-factum principle solves the skeptic’s problem by explaining that since we are the cause of what we make, we can know what was made. Since humans have made the civil world, they can understand the cause of the civil world and know the truth about it. Thus the skeptic, who claims knowledge is impossible, is incorrect because it is possible to know the truth about what humans have made. For Vico, making something becomes the criteria for knowing the truth about it (AW 56).
The importance of fashioning oneself in the correct metaphysical configuration cannot be overemphasized. This is as important as a correctly folded protein vs a denatured protein…one is functional and the other is stripped of life because it no longers has the LIGHT within it.
Ok, I jumped around a bit because it is a complex subject but I know anons are brilliant critters and hopefully, you will understand something of the SHITTEST now more than you did. To close we should examine the mythos of the Birth of the Buddha into the higher realms as well…for he defeats Maya/Mara (she is the same mother) or the material but it is not a physical defeat but one of patterning himself metaphysically and spiritually into being born as a higher being. It is worth noting that someone who is going to be born into the higher realms MUST DIE HERE…you cannot occupy the two separate realms at the same time, polluting the spiritual body with the material realm. There is much left out of the Buddha's storyline like the fact that he was probably tortured to death during the 7 hours between his final test and his ascension. For he must die to this world to be born into the next as surely as an infant is tortured in birth here exiting the FLESH body of its mother's vagina and the excruciating trauma of being born.
Here is a plain version:
As the about-to-be Buddha, Siddhartha Gautama, sat in meditation, Mara brought his most beautiful daughters to seduce Siddhartha. Siddhartha, however, remained in meditation. Then Mara sent vast armies of monsters to attack him. Yet Siddhartha sat still and untouched.
Mara claimed that the seat of enlightenment rightfully belonged to him and not to the mortal Siddhartha. Mara's monstrous soldiers cried out together, "I am his witness!" Mara challenged Siddhartha, who will speak for you?
Then Siddhartha reached out his right hand to touch the earth, and the earth itself spoke: "I bear you witness!" Mara disappeared. And as the morning star rose in the sky, Siddhartha Gautama realized enlightenment and became a Buddha.
There are much better more emotional and detailed descriptions of the TEST but I know you can find them and read them if you have an interest in the full story. Basically, this is the story of all men who are born into the higher realm and it is a template for you to follow so that you too can finally BE BORN, rather than stuck here dead with the rest of us. ;)
I will give a few lines from a paper I wrote on Transcendental Rationalism a month ago…perhaps this will help as well.
Does it make sense to spend time pondering the sensory
material environment or this hidden transcendental being whose presence is established
Who? His grandmother Marie? His uncle Terry? They're either coming out against him or at least roleplaying it. If they legit betray him, they deserve death, and if they didn't, they would be happy to know that someone lashing out against them would only accelerate things further.
http://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/2004/0050/latest/DLM296001.html
A prisoner is entitled to receive at least 1 private visitor each week for a minimum duration of 30 minutes.
Excellent find!
<saved - http://archive.is/aN6nq
This is from a 2004 act though, are we sure it's still in effect 15 years later? Why would a 2017 news report say it's not allowed? Perhaps it was over-rode?
it occurs to me that the best candidates, white women, will generally be intelligent and not want to get pregnant unless they could verify for sure that it was Tarrant's and not some kind of nigger semen. I guess they'd find out in 8 months… something like them swapping in Jew semen would be more insidious and take longer to figure out…
So we would need some kind of verification process for the semen, like an ability to DNA test it against a biological sample from Tarrant, and a trusted escort agency who will secure the samples at all times.
again though, you're reading from a 2004 act, I am concerned it may have been amended. For example when you read the present policies listed on https://www.corrections.govt.nz/working_with_offenders/prison_sentences/staying_connected_with_friends_and_family/mail.html
Corrections provides writing paper and envelopes, and pays for standard postage for up to three letters per week.
There might be a window…
. If the person wishes to send a fast post letter or a parcel, they must pay for this themselves.
However the 'parcel' might be stopped by:
All letters (with some exceptions) are checked by staff for contraband
The question is WHAT constitutes contraband. According to https://www.corrections.govt.nz/resources/research_and_statistics/contraband_in_prisons.html
Contraband in prisons includes alcohol, communication devices, drugs, drug paraphernalia, tattoo equipment, weapons and other items.
It's the (((other items))) vagueness which has me worried. Later elaboration on list…
Other, including money, gang paraphernalia, prescription medicines and tobacco.
"Including" is not "limited to", so it sounds like they could in theory say ANYTHING is "other" if they didn't want a prisoner to have it. That seems like way too much power and interpretation to allow guards to have, as they could essentially strip a prisoner of their rights!
Enough with the drones, we need affordable low-tech solutions.
Why sage? I agree with you. Warrior women can take test to be manlier, declare themselves FtM transgender, then enter male prisons, go off the test for health reasons, get pregnant, give birth to Tarrant babies on taxpayer dime.
As Leibniz will later point out in his Monadology;
<82. As for minds, or rational souls [see 29]: I stand by my view, just expressed,
that basically there is the same thing in all living things and animals so that both
the soul and the animal begin only when the world begins, and never come to an
end, any more than the world does; but I maintain that there is something special
to be said about rational animals, as follows. Their little spermatic animals, to the
extent that they are no more than that, have only ordinary souls, ones that can
feel; but when the select few come, through an act of conception, to have the
nature of a human being, their feeling souls are raised to the level of reason, and
to the privileges of minds.
Is it reasonable to cast aside these privileges of the reasoning mind to better speculate on
something that is chaotic, fluid and ever-changing in its nature or shall we focus on those
privileges that are the gift of the reason of the Rational and conscious mind?
Observer as Subject; the Shifting Material Construct.
It could be said that we are all contending on a personal battleground, one of thought and reason,
one that will either define mankind as sensory animal churning him as flotsam on a ceaseless
chaotic sea of the material apparatus or something yet to be born into conscious
understanding of greater things; the birth then, so to speak, of the Observer or he
who is triumphant, Transcendent Man. Do we choose to entertain
the simulation aspect of mind-body theory and apply ourselves diligently to coherence with that
which remains steadfast within this tempest of the material realm? For if consciousness is not an
aspect of the shifting material nature of the universe what can be said of the sensual experience
or of their merits?
If John Locke’s argument within the realm of Empiricist thought of mankind as a tabula
rasa was correct there would the merit of infinite variety within man’s sensual experience.
Perhaps, with this infinite variety, we would never have been capable of thinking consistently
enough to develop such things as language, for all mankind would be drowning in a vast and
heavy sea of variety and sensual experiences without any coherence other than a prison of his
[–] 17629821? ago
This is the most aspergers thing I've ever read