0
0

[–] 17622135? ago 

Vico has an interesting quote about this while discussing Descartes proposition that "I think therefore I am."

While Vico couches this in an etymology, he does provide another justification for it. Descartes famously used "I think therefore I am" to provide a first principle that refutes skepticism. Vico claims that this does not work because it does not entirely address the challenge of the skeptics. The skeptic knows that he or she exists. The skeptic does not, however, know anything significant about that existence because the skeptic cannot know the cause of his or her ideas (AW 55). The verum-factum principle solves the skeptic’s problem by explaining that since we are the cause of what we make, we can know what was made. Since humans have made the civil world, they can understand the cause of the civil world and know the truth about it. Thus the skeptic, who claims knowledge is impossible, is incorrect because it is possible to know the truth about what humans have made. For Vico, making something becomes the criteria for knowing the truth about it (AW 56).

The importance of fashioning oneself in the correct metaphysical configuration cannot be overemphasized. This is as important as a correctly folded protein vs a denatured protein…one is functional and the other is stripped of life because it no longers has the LIGHT within it.

Ok, I jumped around a bit because it is a complex subject but I know anons are brilliant critters and hopefully, you will understand something of the SHITTEST now more than you did. To close we should examine the mythos of the Birth of the Buddha into the higher realms as well…for he defeats Maya/Mara (she is the same mother) or the material but it is not a physical defeat but one of patterning himself metaphysically and spiritually into being born as a higher being. It is worth noting that someone who is going to be born into the higher realms MUST DIE HERE…you cannot occupy the two separate realms at the same time, polluting the spiritual body with the material realm. There is much left out of the Buddha's storyline like the fact that he was probably tortured to death during the 7 hours between his final test and his ascension. For he must die to this world to be born into the next as surely as an infant is tortured in birth here exiting the FLESH body of its mother's vagina and the excruciating trauma of being born.

Here is a plain version:

As the about-to-be Buddha, Siddhartha Gautama, sat in meditation, Mara brought his most beautiful daughters to seduce Siddhartha. Siddhartha, however, remained in meditation. Then Mara sent vast armies of monsters to attack him. Yet Siddhartha sat still and untouched.

Mara claimed that the seat of enlightenment rightfully belonged to him and not to the mortal Siddhartha. Mara's monstrous soldiers cried out together, "I am his witness!" Mara challenged Siddhartha, who will speak for you?

Then Siddhartha reached out his right hand to touch the earth, and the earth itself spoke: "I bear you witness!" Mara disappeared. And as the morning star rose in the sky, Siddhartha Gautama realized enlightenment and became a Buddha.

There are much better more emotional and detailed descriptions of the TEST but I know you can find them and read them if you have an interest in the full story. Basically, this is the story of all men who are born into the higher realm and it is a template for you to follow so that you too can finally BE BORN, rather than stuck here dead with the rest of us. ;)

I will give a few lines from a paper I wrote on Transcendental Rationalism a month ago…perhaps this will help as well.

Does it make sense to spend time pondering the sensory

material environment or this hidden transcendental being whose presence is established

regardless of his fluid material environment.

0
0

[–] 17622137? ago 

As Leibniz will later point out in his Monadology;

<82. As for minds, or rational souls [see 29]: I stand by my view, just expressed,

that basically there is the same thing in all living things and animals so that both

the soul and the animal begin only when the world begins, and never come to an

end, any more than the world does; but I maintain that there is something special

to be said about rational animals, as follows. Their little spermatic animals, to the

extent that they are no more than that, have only ordinary souls, ones that can

feel; but when the select few come, through an act of conception, to have the

nature of a human being, their feeling souls are raised to the level of reason, and

to the privileges of minds.

Is it reasonable to cast aside these privileges of the reasoning mind to better speculate on

something that is chaotic, fluid and ever-changing in its nature or shall we focus on those

privileges that are the gift of the reason of the Rational and conscious mind?

Observer as Subject; the Shifting Material Construct.

It could be said that we are all contending on a personal battleground, one of thought and reason,

one that will either define mankind as sensory animal churning him as flotsam on a ceaseless

chaotic sea of the material apparatus or something yet to be born into conscious

understanding of greater things; the birth then, so to speak, of the Observer or he

who is triumphant, Transcendent Man. Do we choose to entertain

the simulation aspect of mind-body theory and apply ourselves diligently to coherence with that

which remains steadfast within this tempest of the material realm? For if consciousness is not an

aspect of the shifting material nature of the universe what can be said of the sensual experience

or of their merits?

If John Locke’s argument within the realm of Empiricist thought of mankind as a tabula

rasa was correct there would the merit of infinite variety within man’s sensual experience.

Perhaps, with this infinite variety, we would never have been capable of thinking consistently

enough to develop such things as language, for all mankind would be drowning in a vast and

heavy sea of variety and sensual experiences without any coherence other than a prison of his

own solipsism or internal reflection.

0
0

[–] 17622139? ago 

I swear to g*d the larping gets weirder and weirder each passing month.

0
0

[–] 17622141? ago 

Whatever you say kike ;)

You know the words are not for you because you will never understand them anyway since you are a material creation and have no connection to the spiritual or higher realms.

0
0

[–] 17626721? ago 

0
0

[–] 17629811? ago 

pic 4 did NOT age well

0
0

[–] 17626726? ago 

How about New Zealanders grow a pair like Tarrant and storm the prison and break him out

0
0

[–] 17629812? ago 

Sheesh, leave it to a group of white incels to talk about another mans cum. We all know you phaggets would open wide for the chance to cum taste and test for 100% verification that it's truly his.

0
0

[–] 17629817? ago 

I'm pro Tarrant, so don't take this the wrong way, but its kinda gay to be worried about another man's cum and where it goes.

0
0

[–] 17629818? ago 

really? so eugenics means nothing to you?

0
0

[–] 17629820? ago 

Uh, you got some white stuff on your hair on the left…

0
0

[–] 17629821? ago 

This is the most aspergers thing I've ever read

load more comments ▼ (1 remaining)