[–] MolochHunter ago
their partners need to check the exclusions on their life insurance policies
[–] VinceFoster 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Anybody do any steganography analysis on the images?
[–] bwarren2010 ago
Traitors.....hang by the neck until death.....make sure no one EVER TRIES THIS AGAIN
[–] Sallywuffs ago (edited ago)
Lysol Head...you may get your wish on Barry and Hillary. Here is one of Trump's tweets with a speculative decode I just finished: ______________________________________________-
Donald J. Trump ✔ @realDonaldTrump
The Fake News Media has NEVER been more Dishonest or Corrupt than it is right now. There has never been a time like this in American History. Very exciting but also, very sad! Fake News is the absolute Enemy of the People and our Country itself!
8:24 AM - Mar 19, 2019
CLUES T-F-N-M NEVER D C T-A-H V-V (F-N-E-P-C)! which can be read:
(53)=5-3=8=H A-D-C=8 = H T-A-H = 29 = HRC V-V = 44 (F-N-E-P-C)! = 44-44
Total read (speculative)
H--H--HRC--44-44-44
Barry and Hillary. There you go.
Note Barry was 44th President, in a manner of speaking; also 4+4 = 8 = H, "H" being a reference to HUSSEIN
One could also read HUMA ABEDIN (H-A).
These are like crossword puzzles. The answers in a puzzle may be "correct" but that doesn't make the puzzle "true" or "false". It is just a puzzle.
[–] Sallywuffs ago (edited ago)
I am sympathetic, sometimes it is hard for me to go back and understand my own notes. I have trouble following SB2 sometimes, and do not use all of his methods or even refer to Q drops.I stay totally within the published tweet.
Decoding is not for everyone.
The trouble is that unless I publish the decode"proof" and reasons for my speculations, a lot of people will scream that I am just making it up.
I never make an assertion on a decode unless I can back it up with the clues and the "proof"; but I usually do not publish the full proof, unless I am challenged for "making it up". Most people cannot follow or are not interested.
And there are many ways to interpret the codes...I do not claim to be 100% correct in my decodes, nor do I claim to understand their meaning. They are inherently vague and "deniable".
But in the tweet cited above, there are 5 references that can be interpreted as pointing to Barack Obama (plus one to Hillary); and the tweet occurred within 24 hours of Q posting portraits of six individuals in the Obama administration suspected as being involved in treason.
So whether the coded occurrence of "44" and "H" five times in a short tweet is a coincidence or not, each person will have to decide for themselves.
I posted the proof because Lysolhead expressed hope that Barry and Hillary would be included in the party, and my decode happened to hit on that particular sentiment. Of course, it could all be a coincidence...this possibility must be admitted. But it is not a possibility that I consider likely, although I admit there may be errors in my method or its meaning. For example, Huma Abedin could be indicated in one of the references.
[–] eolianpariah ago
ominous