0
0

[–] Sallywuffs ago  (edited ago)

The decode I posted on Obama (44-8-H multiple times)is a great example.

Q posted pix of the "Dirty Seven" (Clapper, Comey, McCabe, Brennan, Lynch, Rice, Yates, and Lynch) with NO COPY, just headlines indicating the role they played in OBAMA's administration.

So the posts point at Obama as much as they point at the individuals in the portraits.

The repetitive appearance of "Obama" in code five times in a concurrent TRUMP tweet is thus a strong circumstantial confirmation both of the code in the tweet, and the real implications of the Q posts.

But each is independent of the other, and does not rely on the other reference.

0
0

[–] Sallywuffs ago  (edited ago)

I read Q and tend to believe the hints and narrative there...but my decodes are completely independent of Q. SB2 refers back to a lot of Q material and Q drops, but my decodes are completely independent of Q. They are done only with reference to the internals in Trump's tweets, though naturally I get informed on names and ideas from Q and Qanon.