The "either/or" only applies when they want us to target Muslims first, to distract from them. Muslims will always be the more obvious threat. If we always focus on them, we'll never find the Jews as they dig deeper into our society as cryptokikes.
inhumane ceremoniously prepared food (Halal and Kosher)
This is going to require some explanation for me. I mean, I understand how Kosher is inhumane…
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kosher_foods#Ritual_slaughter
These strict guidelines require the animal be killed by a single cut across the throat to a precise depth, severing both carotid arteries, both jugular veins, both vagus nerves, the trachea and the esophagus, no higher than the epiglottis and no lower than where cilia begin inside the trachea, causing the animal to bleed to death. Orthodox Jews explain that this ensures the animal dies instantly without unnecessary suffering, but many animal rights activists view the process as cruel, claiming that the animal may not lose consciousness immediately, and activists have called for it to be banned.
But I don't understand what is inhumane about Halal food
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islamic_dietary_laws#Prohibited_methods_of_slaughtering
strangled to death
beaten to death
died due to falling
killed by being smitten by horn
eaten by wild beast
On the other hand…
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shechita#Animal_welfare_controversies
The UK Farm Animal Welfare Council said that the method by which Kosher and Halal meat is produced causes "significant pain and distress" to animals and should be banned.
I understand how the "single cut, let it bleed to death" is torture by Jews, but I don't see that requirement mentioned under Halal. It's not like we would mercifully kill animals via strangulation/falling… is somehow the "beaten to death" prohibition a prevention of using bolt guns to the skull?