0
0

[–] 17451871? ago 

And i want to stick to facts and logic, so there is no way to shill in any direction. Facts and logic.

0
0

[–] 17451873? ago 

Occam's razor. Ridiculously unrealistic conspiracy. This thread is jewish subversion.

0
0

[–] 17451879? ago 

Occams razor is good i think. But this is a thought experiment, and we can hopefully.. think.

0
0

[–] 17451910? ago 

It's not a math problem, but the clear attempt to dunb down the language made it clear that it's either a Jew or a shill with an education.

0
0

[–] 17451912? ago 

dunb down

True. But does anyone else care to weigh in on the topic with anything else? So far had a few great discussions.

0
0

[–] 17451874? ago 

Trump was said to be popular by the same infallible athirities who said he was unpopular. He was a populist - appealing to the deplorable masses who besiege all right thinkers. Simultaneously, all were to know he was unpopular, and people who were not to be deplored (or else) made if clear people were not to support Trump (or else).

0
0

[–] 17451880? ago 

>>12963210

But how does this tie into the thread topic?

0
0

[–] 17451883? ago 

I was getting to that

0
0

[–] 17451875? ago 

Could jews really be the end of the trail? Is that the best thing to focus on? To me it seems like having a common goal is good, as long as the world gets better. But i also know that people are rarely if ever truly indepedent in their conclusions.

0
0

[–] 17451876? ago 

Dont know. Thanks again to mods, seems like a healthy concept to discuss from time to time. As long as we stick to empirical thoughts

0
0

[–] 17451877? ago 

. As long as we stick to empirical thoughts

Which i have provided little of.. but thays because everything empirical points to jews lol. But then, can we empirically prove we have all the breadcrumbs? Fuck

0
0

[–] 17451878? ago 

too bad tarrant couldn’t go after some legit corporate or political or other seminal target

0
0

[–] 17451881? ago 

The actual deplorable masses are the or-else thinkers who cause massive societal stresses whenever their ideas gain currency. As such, one of the modern fixations of government is the suppression of the or-elsists, so they cannot suppress others.

This is why nazis are suppressed, but simultaneously, this is why social justice is perennially unpopular. All people fixated on suppressing others are or-elsists, including those who are on “correct” sides. The only truly winning move is not to play.

Since or-elsist thought exists in all but the most pacifistic communities, political operatives often work to maintain equilibrium between or-elsist thinkers so that as much as possible they suppress one another without making friendships that hurt “good” people. Occasional fuckups happen when non-or-elsists are declared or-elsists; there’s a sense in which inquisitors are rarely wrong, because they rarely apologize and their targets certainly don’t want to obey them!

Actual pacifists do better. Space travel proceeds slowly despite controversy over its expense because its supporters don’t turn rebel when it doesn’t advance while its opponents are heavily or-elsist in nature. Whatever your cause, denounce or-elsism and mean it. Learn tolerance.

We all prosper when we all prosper in peace!

0
0

[–] 17451882? ago 

Are you ik the wrong thread, im confused.

0
0

[–] 17451886? ago 

OP said the thread is game theory. I talked about authorities using tactics and underlying equilibrium. It makes me smile the way the liars who submit themselves to this site only protest my habitually off-topic posts when I’m on-topic.

0
0

[–] 17451888? ago 

I only make a cursory effort to ever be on topic in a place as dishonest as this one. The whole board is whatever people make oc it.

0
0

[–] 17451890? ago 

Great. Thanks i guess. Ffs.

load more comments ▼ (23 remaining)