0
0

[–] 17452383? ago 

it's not a different topic because how do you know that your "empirical logic" is empirically correct when there are constantly multiple potential outcomes

0
0

[–] 17452390? ago 

Everything reduces down to trust. You have to trust your senses. You have to trust what others say is true aout their reality. You have to trust that you see things as others do. There is no way to prove that two people see the same thing, we can only create a consensus of trust. Similar in how there is no objectivity only a consensus of what is said to be objective truth, since all that have a perspective are subjects.

0
0

[–] 17452386? ago 

Because you must prove god to state it as a matter of fact singular possible conclusion, or else say it is the best logical guess. I guess it comes down to semantics, and im doing my best to keep this thread cohesive so the mods dont regret letting it exist.

0
0

[–] 17452397? ago 

short answer: how have you proved you exist?

longer answer: how have you assumed the existence of a soul and ability to think for oneself and be an independent entity separate from the existence of God? if God does not exist, where is your proof? so since is there is no proof, then you exist, do you? so what is your soul? can you prove to me that a soul exists? so what - or who are you?

>>12963714

hence parts of God

0
0

[–] 17452392? ago 

And if we start arguing about the existence of god, the thread will become that. God thread. Not mega jew thread.

muh mega jew

Yes! The mega jew. Lets hope he isnt real.