[–] [deleted] ago
[–] i_scream_trucks ago
You don't have to even if you know it.
[–] sane 1 point 2 points 3 points (+3|-1) ago (edited ago)
They might (MIGHT) allow rape if saving the life of someone, via a change to laws. California did it in the past. Too many people in crashed cars catching fire were being watched burning alive screaming helplessly by timid observers.
They burned alive trapped in their seatbelts and such because a wealthy white man TOUCHING a person with possible spine damage RESULTED IN MANY HUGE MASSIVE LAWSUITS! (in fact only in california are they sued in the last 12 years in the US)
I am not kiidding! Saving the life of a car victim from flames, resulted in entire lives of white men being sued into oblivion.
word spread RAPIDLY.
Then california realized that they needed a law to protect white employed men saving lives. They rapidly passed a law making it ok to damage a spine removing a person in distress. Its called "The CALIFORNIA GOOD SAMARITAN LAW"
https://www.verywellhealth.com/good-samaritan-laws-1298841
Sadly in 2007 jewish lawyers silently REVOKED AND NEUTERED the good samaritan law and in 2008 supreme court of california once again declared WHITE MEN WITH JOBS CAN BE SUED FOR SAVING PEOPLE!!! (not kidding)
Division 2.5 of California's Health and Safety Code Statute 1799.102 was for nearly a decade rescinded !
on March 21, 2007 by the California Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District/Division 3 restricted the state's good samaritan law, and
Blacks still just stand around in a crowd and watch a car crash victim scream and burn to death (many live leak videos), but at least now a white man in california can save a life if they still feel inclined, and many still do now.
White men in california are EXEMPT from spine damage lawsuits by bitter negroes the white men with jobs save in VERY recent years due to new wording of law in claifornia :
Amended Statute 1799.201
"No person who in good faith, and not for compensation, renders emergency medical or NONMEDICAL care or assistance at the scene of an emergency shall be liable for civil damages resulting from any act or omission other than an act or omission constituting gross negligence or willful or wanton misconduct."
For CPR: they can just add a few words to that law :
renders at the scene emergency medical or nonmedical care , or molests, fondles, rapes, or digitally penetrates, or any form of sexual crime
But the jew lawyers will silently delete the law like california did from March 21, 2007 to Dec 2018 inclusive... (over 10 years of more white men sued!!)
RAPE EXEMPTIONS NEEDED NOW!
Keep in mind "#MeToo" effect will also DESTROY a man's life, so maybe let all women die and avoid CPR.
[–] B166-ER 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago
If I were ever in that situation I'd just yank the silly sod out of the car to safety and then promptly flee the scene. Having my name on police forms and/or getting recorded is apparently where you get in trouble. And I also wouldn't fall for the news mention a good Samaritan saving a life and how the victim hopes they'll come forward so they can be thanked... Yeah, thank you with one hand and get sued by their insurance company with the other.
[–] HeavyBrain 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
So what you are saying, I living in a country where you are required to help (or face up to 5 years), ever decide to go to the US must always rememeber to let people burn to death, got it.
[–] Cat-hax 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Never get involved, this is how a woman deals with embarrassment that she put on herself, blame every one else especially white males. Also free gibs.