0
1

[–] 17419189? 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

ACCELERATE

C

C

E

L

E

R

A

T

E

>>12945062

HE CAN'T KEEP GETTING AWAY WITH IT!!!

0
0

[–] 17420981? ago 

that guy in pic related is ded

0
0

[–] 17420983? ago 

What's the source of it?

0
1

[–] 17420985? 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Even so, his spirit lives on.

0
1

[–] 17411375? 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

who even SEES the video for 'up to 10 years' imprisonment

Get a list of all kiwi politicians or anyone one of some reputation start spamming it at their social media and email it to them.

0
0

[–] 17411381? ago 

Make sure it's the dank one with Turbo Killer mixed over it

0
0

[–] 17411380? ago 

Great idea

0
0

[–] 17411378? ago 

This. Give it an unassuming header

0
2

[–] 17416370? 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Anybody who knowingly supplies, distributes, exhibits or displays a restricted publication to any person who does not meet the age criteria is committing an offence. A restricted publication is objectionable if made available to a person underage, and an individual can receive up to three months imprisonment or a fine not exceeding $10,000.

Okay. I would assume kiwis still have access to pornographic Websites, which require only that you click a button to confirm that you're 18, and the Jewish pornographers who run them haven't been prosecuted by this law. So, surely, the video can be uploaded to any Website that asks you to confirm your age on the same basis. Unless of course there exists a double standard that one would have to admit to, that the distribution of the mind rot that is porn is desirable even despite this law, whereas the distribution of factual news footage is not.