[–] Thisismyvoatusername 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago (edited ago)
That guy seems to understand the Qtard phenomenon far less than he thinks he does. It get the sense he doesn’t actually spend much time doing an in depth dive into the subject and so integrates disparate things he sees on the chans, Voat and Twitter then incorrectly ascribes them all to Qtards. Still, it was an amusing read. And he is right about them being a stupid bunch, just wrong about particulars of what they believe. This bit was funny:
None of these details are relevant, and most aren’t even true. They aren’t evidence of a conspiracy, nor motive for one. Why would it matter if John Podesta was in the same country as a mass shooting? After all, he spends most of his time in the United States, which has more mass shootings than any other country. Is he responsible for all of them? (Don’t answer that, Q believers probably think so.)
[–] derram ago
https://archive.ph/T9tsk :
'This includes the QAnon conspiracy. '
'And that could be the biggest reason of all that Q believers want so badly to latch on to this horrific crime. '
'Its rapid-fire mix of memes, conspiracy theories, incomprehensible internet references, and racism are the same brew that QAnon is made of. '
'According to initial reports, the accused Christchurch shooter had no link to QAnon, the supposed plot by Donald Trump to sweep up the deep state in military tribunals. '
'So it’s natural that Q believers would see the Christchurch massacre as yet another front in the endless battle between good and evil at the core of their beliefs. '
This has been an automated message.