0
1

[–] 17342692? 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

We don’t have the senate. Did u happen to see how many senators signed up to vote for the resolution against the wall and national emergency?

0
0

[–] 17347323? ago 

53-47.

R's do have the Senate.

Thanks for playing

0
0

[–] 17367585? ago 

Thanks for playing dumbass. https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.nytimes.com/2019/03/14/us/politics/senate-vote-trump-national-emergency.amp.html Thanks for playing.... actually just stop playing cuz your not very good at it. Good day.

0
0

[–] 17349711? ago 

Man U really really r stupid

0
0

[–] 17349661? ago 

And what good does it do?

0
1

[–] 17342075? 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

"Midterms are safe" - Q (just before rampant cheating happens)

0
0

[–] 17347338? ago 

"Senate was the target" - Q

Trump never campaigned for any R House candidate. Only did Senate candidates.

Senate won.

0
1

[–] 17342064? 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

You're foolish to not care about the house. It gives Trump yet another obstacle to overcome. Round two of the tax cuts we can kiss goodbye for now, and Nancy Pelosi is now third in line for the presidency.

0
1

[–] 17342734? 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Not only that but no law whatsoever will get passed with the radical enemy combatants in control of the house. And I believe the house is in charge of funding so u can kiss the spaceforce goodbye too.

0
0

[–] 17347362? ago  (edited ago)

You're foolish to claim midterms were not saved.

They need the D's to control House to expose their evil to the world, but not having more power than R controlled Senate.

0
0

[–] 17385498? ago 

The D's have been exposing their evil to the world for many decades. Why would people start caring now?

The more people lose, the more they become unhinged and their movements fall apart. The more power they have the easier it is to stay confident, stay unified, and keep the extreme evil hidden.

I think the Democrats would be easier to take down if they were acting like Trump just won the presidency again, rather than if they just took control of the house and now have the power to launch all manner of investigations against Trump.

0
0

[–] 17357375? [S] ago  (edited ago)

If Sessions had done his job, the House would have remained in Trump's control. Trump complained about Sessions but knew he couldn't remove him until after the election. Trump had spoken about "do nothing" Sessions in his rallies and mentioned the importance of the House and how we need to win it back. These two laments have been expressed by Trump himself. Q wants to spin it otherwise. That's fine. I understand the psyops game. But I'm just warning him he can't keep making promises about events that then don't happen. Such confidence in outcome can be contagious but it can also backfire. (I speak as a prophet for America.)

"As it is, you boast in your arrogance. All such boasting is evil." James 416

"Do not boast about tomorrow, for you do not know what a day may bring." Proverbs 27:1

0
0

[–] 17369248? ago  (edited ago)

Sessions did do his job.

No, his job was not to do what you rando shills claimed he 'should' have done.

Every human being can only take one series of courses of actions.

Sessions was part of the Trump campaign. Black hats and fake news would have said "political attack by Trump!"

For optics he was tasked to allow Huber and Horowitz to work in the background, then Whitaker and then Huber would OPTICS FREE do what you ignorantly claim Sessions "should" have done.

Today is Friday.

HAPPY GOOD FRIDAY.

MOABS INCOMING DIRECTLY OVERHEAD.

0
0

[–] 17344239? ago 

0
0

[–] 17341874? ago 

While I don't really agree with calling everyone shills, you have to be purposefully blind to not see what's going on. Trump is obviously setting up the dems for destruction.

0
0

[–] 17347374? ago 

I don't call EVERYONE shills.

Just the shills are called shills.