0
0

[–] 17333724? ago 

Basically:

Do acknowledge that the OP here is actually a glow in the dark intelligence faggot, because his boss is getting tired of failed ops.

0
0

[–] 17333750? ago 

The "dark intelligence faggot boss" wants an insurgency

Wow.

>>12913288 (wasted dubs)

The Founding Faggots were anti-nationalists

A wild claim made without evidence can be rejected with a "lol, check out this faggot"

0
0

[–] 17333760? ago 

A wild claim made without evidence

Depends on how you define "nationalist", which in turn depends on you define "nation".

The Founders were totally shady cunts though.

0
0

[–] 17333767? ago 

muh ZOG identity

The border separating that thing called "America" from that thing called "Canada" is an imaginary line, separating the single English-speaking European Nation.

Just like the border between that thing called "Austria" and Germany is an imaginary line, separating the single German Nation.

0
0

[–] 17350125? ago 

Wow anon, you're right. Voting for politicians that only pretend to be on our side and making angry posts online about how someone should do something is the only real course of action. Why would anyone possibly want to do something effective?

0
0

[–] 17443012? ago 

Wow, your arguments and reasoning are sure convincing.

0
0

[–] 17333725? ago 

The laws of nature are in fact, the only true laws

which is why no matter what you or Russia or anyone does, they will always be controlled by reality

The Constitution is a blueprint by which you can protect yourself.

…made by men

their "document" was not 'handed down by god' and is not the basis for truth

by choosing slavery

well that would be the fake Constitution written by men…since Nature, as you said, is the Supreme Law:

The Constitution is a blueprint…it presents you with responsibilities

made by men

ergo inherently false and unable to protect you against Nature

0
0

[–] 17333729? ago 

Hmm. Sounds like a religious argument. Interesting, I expected at least 5 different types of common responses, but I didn't didn't expect that one. Considering the current state of religion in "The West", i'm not sure how useful that point of view will be. Care to elaborate further?

0
0

[–] 17333736? ago 

Are you acting on your own free will or are you a conduit for Nature?

0
0

[–] 17333732? ago 

The Founding Faggots were anti-nationalists splitting the real Nation for their own economic benefit and nothing more. The 49th parallel is an imaginary line, separating the English-speaking European Nation.

The Constitution is a worthless piece of paper, not even a blueprint for "muh freedumb." It's a document created by people who ''didn't believe nations were real things," for propaganda purposes only.

0
0

[–] 17333740? ago 

The Constitution is a worthless piece of paper, not even a blueprint for "muh freedumb." It's a document created by people who ''didn't believe nations were real things," for propaganda purposes only.

I agree. I was referring to the principles it contains, not the validity of the document or it's writers. Based post BTW.

>>12913292

Seems off topic, but I agree. I don't think anyone cares about the Torah, did you mean the Talmud?

>>12913312

That's a complex subject anon. A bit esoteric. You should make a thread about it and frame it in a political light. Maybe something like (Does a Nation reflect the free will of individuals, or is it an expression of the Natural order?) just to get the ball rolling.

0
0

[–] 17333742? ago 

nope, it's relevant because it's the basis for my assertion that your argument that the Constitution is a guide to 'keep people free' is ultimately doomed to failure, and it's only a matter of time before it and you will be destroyed…by Nature, as was your OP. You seem to have the idea that the Constitution is Perfect, when all it is is a scrap of paper dictating the behavior of rulers over the ruled, when neither are ever free.

0
0

[–] 17350113? ago 

They were Masons blinded for the most part by notions of equality, starting with the acknowledgement of such regarding men.

On the other hand, the USA had to be inclusive insomuch as people of different origins would come from Europe. It could certainly not limit itself to Britons, Germans, French, Poles, etc. They failed to find a proper middle ground between too focused on one nation (people, blood) and anything flies. A problem which would have been easily solved by making the USA a land for Whites, and proceeding to defining who is White. But then it would have implied the exclusion of European Jews, Negroes and "Natives".

So there, we ended with the Constitution, essentially an agreement, merely a useful tool intended to limit the powers of the government as much as possible as long as people are ready to make sure both parties stick to it, and also established to define the conditions of proper conduct for citizens, for the sake of civilized exchanges.

But it's just a piece of paper and every single weakness ensconced within is free to be used and abused by any party.

Entire parts of the US Constitution have been ignored for decades. For one, the Federal Government has centralized and stolen the legitimate powers of lesser structures such as states. It has infringed upon weapon ownership as much as it has recently trampled the principles of the 1st Amendment through the War on Terror, a mischievous concept when in reality the terror is generated by the government.

The Constitution will never protect you if you don't insist on making sure national institutions are headed by principled people. At which point, you would realize that the Constitution isn't exactly essential. It is more practical as a set one can quickly refer to instead of having to endlessly re-debate the same old point for the umpteenth time.

Which, you will notice, is exactly what happens with the notion of legal jurisprudence wherein every single judge can become judge and rewrite the laws for entire states and beyond, turning the country into a land of lawyers, endless bickering and considerable lobbying.

In the end, one needs to attain the bitter conclusion that America is a complete failure and has been a den of evil and corruption, allowed to live for way too long. America and its Constitution will need to be dislocated in order to make place for proper administrative structures based on sound racial policies.

0
0

[–] 17350116? ago 

They were Masons blinded for the most part by notions of equality, starting with the acknowledgement of such regarding men. On the other hand, the USA had to be inclusive insomuch as people of different origins would come from Europe. It could certainly not limit itself to Britons, Germans, French, Poles, etc. They failed to find a proper middle ground between too focused on one nation (people, blood) and anything flies. A problem which would have been easily solved by making the USA a land for Whites, and proceeding to defining who is White. But then it would have implied the exclusion of European Jews, Negroes and "Natives".

This just shows you know nothing of the first laws they passed, or any of the treatises which they wrote on the matter. Both the policies they passed and the philosophy they spoke of explicitly state that they wanted a White-only country. The very first immigration act passed limited not only citizenship, but the right to come here, to "free white men of good character". They did as well as they could. The supreme courts just went rogue 180 years later.

So there, we ended with the Constitution, essentially an agreement, merely a useful tool intended to limit the powers of the government as much as possible as long as people are ready to make sure both parties stick to it, and also established to define the conditions of proper conduct for citizens, for the sake of civilized exchanges.

But it's just a piece of paper and every single weakness ensconced within is free to be used and abused by any party…

Yes, it IS just a piece of paper. The fundamental confusion here is who they were trying to direct with that piece of paper. It pertains not to the Government, but to the CITIZENS. It tells the CITIZENS to do what they can to maintain their liberty in spite of the government. But the citizens got soft and complacent, and exactly what you would expect to happen, happened. The government did exactly what governments do. It is the people who failed to violently enforce their own authority. It is the citizens who are largely to blame.

The Constitution will never protect you if you don't insist on making sure national institutions are headed by principled people. At which point, you would realize that the Constitution isn't exactly essential. It is more practical as a set one can quickly refer to instead of having to endlessly re-debate the same old point for the umpteenth time.

Which, you will notice, is exactly what happens with the notion of legal jurisprudence wherein every single judge can become judge and rewrite the laws for entire states and beyond, turning the country into a land of lawyers, endless bickering and considerable lobbying.

Yes, because the people shirked their constitutional responsibility to to kill corrupt sleazy shitbags abusing their positions of power. The Founders told the people this would happen- they just forgot.

In the end, one needs to attain the bitter conclusion that America is a complete failure and has been a den of evil and corruption, allowed to live for way too long. America and its Constitution will need to be dislocated in order to make place for proper administrative structures based on sound racial policies.

I agree that the government sucks. But it is this way precisely because the Government strayed from their founding principles, and the People allowed the government to do so, and in so doing, strayed from their Constitutional responsibilities.

0
0

[–] 17333735? ago 

The torah is not a law, it does not bind the government or grant any rights, it never has. Furthermore, the torah is not a physical barrier or a magical parchment that guarantees rights of any kind.

That's why jews are not the chosen one and shouldn't be a special class of citizenry.

0
0

[–] 17333738? ago 

The U.S. Constitution is a usurpation of our original, intended government the real founding fathers fought for and laid down. The cunts who couldn't pay off their foreign debts to kick the king out without levying even worse taxes and duties on our founding fathers were scum-sucking traitor prick bastards. To Hell with that weasel Washington. The sooner this muh paper cult dies, the better off the White Man in this country will be. I don't need a paper to keep my guns, just lead.

0
0

[–] 17333739? ago 

And no, I don't conflate the Bill with the Constitution. The OP does, so I'm responding in kind.

0
0

[–] 17333744? ago 

Blah blah blah, firearms are about equality. God made men, women, and fags, but it was concealed carry that made them equal. A peaceful world isn’t some bubblewrapped world where people can’t hurt each other, it’s a world where people just won’t hurt each other.

Go out into a crowded public space, buy yourself a trendy snack, and enjoy the proximity of all the people who really actually won’t blow your brains out.

0
0

[–] 17333747? ago 

People speak of the law and make claims that the Constitution guarantees our rights.

Rights don't exist. Anyone who disagrees is either extremely naive or ideologically deluded.

0
0

[–] 17333755? ago 

>>12913415

"Rights don't exist!"

Irrelevant.

States don't exist either. Nor do governments, laws, or words.

Yet here we are fighting over them.

0
0

[–] 17333756? ago 

States don't exist either.

Yes, they do.

Nor do governments, laws, or words.

All of those things exist.

Rights do not.

0
0

[–] 17333761? ago 

Which ever ideal you choose for the right suits you right but when you have no might to enforce it, it's not and that will suit you right .

0
0

[–] 17334846? ago 

States don't exist either.

There is an entity called the US government which exercises a monopoly of force over a large part of North America. It exists undeniably. Political power grows out of the barrel of gun.

laws

Laws don't "exist" but they are enforced by states

0
0

[–] 17333748? ago 

guarantees our rights.

Human rights are a liberal fiction. Rights do not exist. Any and all rights are granted solely by the state – they are privileges. You should also think of how the concept of rights is weaponized against the pro-white governments of the past:

South Africa enacts some of the most thoroughgoing segregation in human history

MUH HUMAN RIGHTS, MUH INEQUALITY

Nazi Germany tries to pull off the Jewish parasite and protect its people

MUH SIX MILLION, MUH AGGRESSION, MUH POLISH SLAVE LABOR

load more comments ▼ (17 remaining)